SB 1292 California Senate · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Enhanced curb management system.

Summary
Existing law authorizes, until January 1, 2030, a local agency, as defined, to install automated forward facing parking control devices on city-owned or district-owned parking enforcement vehicles for the purpose of taking photographs of parking violations occurring in bicycle lanes. Existing law requires a designated employee of a city, county, city and county, or a contracted law enforcement agency for a special transit district, who is qualified by the city and county or the district to issue parking citations, to review photographs for the purpose of determining whether a parking violation occurred in a bicycle lane and to issue a notice of violation to the registered owner of a vehicle within 15 calendar days, as specified. Existing law requires these photographic records to be confidential and makes these records available only to public agencies to enforce parking violations. Existing law requires any local agency that implements this pilot program to report to specified committees of the Legislature on the system's effectiveness and impact on traffic outcomes, among other things, by December 31, 2028. This bill would authorize, until January 1, 2032, the City of Los Angeles, Santa Monica, West Hollywood, Inglewood, San Diego, or Long Beach, or the city parking enforcement authority within those cities, to establish an enhanced curb management system (system) that records images of vehicles for the purpose of enforcing parking violations or automating parking payments if certain requirements are met. The bill would require the governing body of the participating city to adopt a public ordinance or resolution that would authorize the use of a system in specified locations, including, among others, passenger loading zones and smart loading zones. The bill would require a participating city that automates parking payments by charging vehicles a fee for access to outline the fee, and any adjusted rates, in an ordinance or resolution. The bill would require the public ordinance or resolution to include an Enhanced Curb Management Use Policy (policy) that sets forth the specific purpose of the system, among other things. The bill would require the policy to be made available for public review, as specified. This bill would require the system to record images of the vehicle and license plate at the time of the violation, and requires, before mailing a notice of parking violation, that the image data be reviewed and approved by a peace officer or person authorized to enforce parking laws. The bill would require the notice of violation to be mailed to the registered owner of the vehicle within 15 calendar days, as specified. The bill would require the image data collected by the system and any identifying information to be confidential, and would require the image data to only be used for the purpose of processing parking violations and charging vehicles a fee for access. This bill would require a participating city to observe a public information campaign for at least 60 days before issuing citations, as specified. The bill would require a participating city to submit a report to its governing body and the transportation committees of the Legislature, as specified. The bill would require the governing body of the participating city to approve an Enhanced Curb Management Impact Report (report) after implementing a system and would require the report to include specified information, including, among other things, the locations where the system was deployed and data for these locations. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect.
Bill status passed 3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Jun 2026
Senate Passage
May 2026
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 20, 2026 Last action Jun 29, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons

What changed between versions

02/20/26 - Introduced 04/22/26 - Amended Senate · 11 edits · Apr 22, 2026
MAJOR
The Senate amendment significantly narrows SB 1292 from a general authorization for any local agency to deploy automated parking enforcement cameras to a pilot program limited to six specific cities (Los Angeles, Santa Monica, West Hollywood, Inglewood, San Diego, and Long Beach) with a sunset date of January 1, 2032. The amendment adds substantial new requirements including a mandatory public use policy, data minimization and anti-sharing restrictions, revenue safeguards to prevent cuts to existing parking enforcement, detailed equity impact reporting, and a post-implementation civil liberties assessment.
SCOPE

The bill was narrowed from allowing any local agency (city, county, or city and county parking enforcement authority) to establish an enhanced curb management system to only six designated jurisdictions: the Cities of Los Angeles, Santa Monica, West Hollywood, Inglewood, San Diego, or Long Beach, or the city parking enforcement authority within those cities. A new definition of 'designated jurisdiction' was added.

TIMELINE

A new Section 40281 was added establishing a sunset provision: the entire article shall remain in effect only until January 1, 2032, and is repealed as of that date. This makes the program a time-limited pilot rather than a permanent authorization.

REQUIREMENT

A new Enhanced Curb Management Use Policy requirement was added (Section 40275(f)). The public ordinance or resolution must include a policy setting forth the specific purpose of the system, authorized uses, rules and processes for employees and contractors, prohibited uses, what data can be collected, who can access it, data protection provisions (unauthorized access, retention, public access, third-party sharing, training, auditing, oversight). The policy must be posted on the jurisdiction's website at least 30 calendar days before adoption.

New data minimization requirements were added in Section 40276(e): the system shall collect only the minimum image data reasonably necessary to identify a vehicle license plate, and to the extent technologically feasible, shall automatically obscure or blur portions of an image that do not depict the license plate or vehicle necessary for enforcement.

New data sharing restrictions were added in Section 40276(f): a designated jurisdiction or contracted vendor shall not cooperate with or provide image data to any individual, agency, or department from another state or to a federal agency, except when required by federal law or a court warrant. Failure to comply results in excess program revenue reverting to the Active Transportation Program.

FISCAL

New revenue and funding safeguards were added in Section 40277(d): revenues must first be used to recover program costs (installation, adjudication, reporting). A designated jurisdiction must maintain its existing commitment of local funds for curbside parking enforcement, expending not less than the annual average of expenditures during fiscal years 2023-24, 2024-25, and 2025-26. Excess revenue must be used for parking management measures within three years or revert to the Active Transportation Program.

ELIGIBILITY

Commercial loading zones were restricted: they can now only be used for enforcing parking violations (not for automating parking payments). Additionally, a designated jurisdiction is prohibited from charging vehicles a fee for access to commercial loading zones that existed prior to the adoption of the authorizing ordinance or resolution.

ENFORCEMENT

A new Section 40280 was added requiring the governing body of a designated jurisdiction to approve an Enhanced Curb Management Impact Report after implementing a system. The report must include: an assessment of impact on civil liberties and civil rights with recommendations, a description of how the system works, fiscal costs (establishment, ongoing, funding), whether deployment locations are predominantly in low-income neighborhoods, and locations where the system was deployed with associated data.

Reporting requirements in Section 40279 were substantially expanded. A specific deadline was added: on or before March 1 of the fifth year in which the system has been implemented, or by December 1, 2031, whichever occurs first. The report must now include detailed data on notices issued by month and year, locations, repeat violators, fees paid, delinquent violations, contested violations and dismissals, implementation and operating costs, revenues collected, and a racial and economic equity impact analysis developed in collaboration with local racial justice and economic equity stakeholder groups, including data broken down by indigent individuals, individuals up to 250 percent above the poverty line, and by ZIP Code.

TECHNICAL

Section 40277(b)(4) was modified to explicitly include affidavits of nonliability under Sections 40208 and 40209 as applicable rights for recipients of notices served by mail, in addition to the existing right to contest under Section 40215.

Section 40276(b) was modified to add explicit language that after the retention period expires, 'the information shall be destroyed,' making the destruction requirement more explicit than the prior version which only stated maximum retention periods.

Floor votes · Senate May 26, 2026

How they voted

287
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 40
May 26, 2026
D Democratic30
28 Yea 2
93% Yea
R Republican10
7 Nay 3
70% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
20
Key actions
6
Committee
5
Amendments
3
Jun 11, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Jun 1, 2026
Committee
Referred to Coms. on TRANS. and P. & C.P.
lower
May 26, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 28. Noes 7. Page 4443.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 4, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Apr 23, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.
upper
Apr 22, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Apr 21, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 2. Page 3958.) (April 20).
upper
Apr 15, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on P., D.T., & C.P. (Ayes 11. Noes 1. Page 3873.) (April 14). Re-referred to Com. on P., D.T., & C.P.
upper
Mar 4, 2026
Committee
Referred to Coms. on TRANS. and P., D.T., & C.P.
upper
Feb 20, 2026
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Laura Richardson
Laura Richardson
DDemocratic
CA
35