SB 1290 California Senate · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Cartwright Act: public procurement of goods and services: Department of Justice: examination of public entity records.

Summary
Existing law establishes the Attorney General as the head of the Department of Justice, with charge of all legal matters in which the state is interested, except as specified. Existing law imposes various requirements on the Attorney General related to consumer protection, including, among others, the supervision of charitable trusts and the enforcement of antitrust laws. Existing law, commonly known as the Cartwright Act, identifies certain acts that are unlawful restraints of trade and unlawful trusts. This bill would authorize the Department of Justice to request to examine contract records, as defined, held by a public entity if the request seeks information that is reasonably related to an investigation initiated by the Attorney General to identify bid rigging and other violations of California law concerning the public procurement of goods and services, and the contract amount exceeds $100,000. The bill would require a public entity to permit the examination and, upon demand, produce within 30 days, in complete and unredacted form, copies of all contract records. The bill would require information and documents obtained under the bill's provisions to only be used for the purpose described above, and would exempt documents or information protected by the attorney-client privilege, as specified. The bill would define "public entity" to include the state, local agencies, and any other political subdivision or public corporation. By imposing new duties on local public entities, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the department to pay a fee to the public entity limited to the direct cost of duplication under these provisions, or a statutory fee, if applicable. The bill would require the department to maintain the confidentiality of the documents or information received to the greatest extent required by law, as specified. The bill would prohibit information obtained in response to a request under these provisions from being provided in response to a request pursuant to the California Public Records Act, as described. Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. The California Constitution requires local agencies, for the purpose of ensuring public access to the meetings of public bodies and the writings of public officials and agencies, to comply with a statutory enactment that amends or enacts laws relating to public records or open meetings and contains findings demonstrating that the enactment furthers the constitutional requirements relating to this purpose. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status in committee 1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 20, 2026 Last action Apr 16, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons

What changed between versions

03/23/26 - Amended Senate 04/15/26 - Amended Senate · 9 edits · Apr 15, 2026
MAJOR
The April 15 amendment significantly narrows and conditions the Department of Justice's authority to examine public entity records for bid rigging. DOJ can now only examine records when there is an active Attorney General investigation, and only 'contract records' involving third-party communications are in scope. The amendment adds strong protections including attorney-client privilege, a use limitation restricting information to procurement investigations, and a CPRA exemption preventing the DOJ from disclosing obtained records publicly.
Scope change
The bill's scope narrowed from a general authorization for DOJ to examine public entity records over $100,000 to a more targeted power limited to active Attorney General investigations into public procurement violations, with examinable records restricted to third-party communications and subject to privilege, use, and disclosure protections.
SCOPE

DOJ examination authority is now conditioned on an active Attorney General investigation into bid rigging or other violations of California law concerning public procurement. Previously the authorization was broader and not tied to a specific ongoing investigation.

Information obtained by DOJ under this section is explicitly excluded from the definition of 'public record' and cannot be disclosed via a California Public Records Act request. However, the public entity's own independent CPRA obligations are unaffected.

The prior legislative intent section expressing the Legislature's commitment to fair competition, protecting the public fisc, and promoting public trust in public contracting was removed entirely.

DEFINITION

New definition of 'contract records' limits examinable materials to records received from, sent to, or communicated with a third party outside the public entity, or that would be available under a California Public Records Act request. Internal-only communications are excluded unless they meet the CPRA availability standard.

REQUIREMENT

Public entities are now explicitly exempt from producing documents protected by attorney-client privilege or any other applicable privilege in response to a DOJ examination request.

ENFORCEMENT

Information and documents obtained under this section may only be used for the purpose of identifying bid rigging and other violations related to public procurement of goods and services. This is a new use restriction not present in the prior version.

Confidentiality of documents received by DOJ is strengthened to require protection at a minimum equal to that afforded to materials subpoenaed under specific Government Code provisions (Article 2, Chapter 2, Part 1, Division 3, Title 2).

TECHNICAL

Two new legislative findings sections were added to satisfy California constitutional requirements for statutes that limit public access to records. The findings state that limiting access is necessary to facilitate cooperation by public agencies and expeditious transfer of records.

FISCAL

Fiscal committee review changed from 'no' to 'yes,' indicating the bill now requires a fiscal committee appropriation review, likely due to the expanded state-mandated local program implications.

Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
11
Key actions
3
Committee
3
Amendments
2
Apr 15, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
Apr 15, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 3869.) (April 14). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
Apr 8, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on JUD. and L. GOV.
upper
Mar 23, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Mar 4, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 20, 2026
Introduced
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Melissa Hurtado
Melissa Hurtado
DDemocratic
CA
16