Wildfire mitigation program: financial assistance to counties.
What changed between versions
New Section 8654.7(e) gives the Office of Emergency Services maximum discretion to adjust funding allocations and strategy to include more counties with smaller dollar, larger scale, whole community approaches to home hardening that strategically and cost-effectively maximize risk mitigation.
Section 8654.8(b) now conditions financial assistance on an appropriation by the Legislature or receipt of additional federal funding, rather than being unconditional. The bill's appropriation status in the digest changed from 'no' to 'yes.'
The specific list of 10 named counties (Lake, Siskiyou, Tuolumne, Shasta, El Dorado, San Diego, Riverside, Calaveras, Los Angeles, and Tehama) was removed from the operative text of Section 8654.8(b), replacing it with a reference to the 7th through 10th ranked counties based on eligibility criteria or an updated successor ranking.
The detailed list of specific communities eligible for assistance (Kelseyville Riviera, Mount Shasta, Ponderosa Hills, Whitmore, Weber Creek, Dulzura/Campo/Potrero) and the enumerated top ten counties were removed from the findings section of Section 1.
New subdivisions (f) and (g) added to Section 8654.2 declaring legislative intent to fund home hardening expansion to the top 7th through 10th ranked counties and to authorize OES to determine how much of existing funding allocations can be modified without impacting federal funds.
The structure count in findings was corrected from 'more than 18,000 structures' to 'more than 16,000 structures' destroyed or damaged by the Eaton and Palisades Fires. The program name was shortened from 'California Wildfire Mitigation Financial Assistance Program (CWMFAP)' to 'California Wildfire Mitigation Program (CWMP)' in several places.