Federal immigration enforcement: report.
Summary
Existing law, the California Values Act, requires the Attorney General, by October 1, 2018, in consultation with the appropriate stakeholders, to publish model policies limiting assistance with immigration enforcement to the fullest extent possible consistent with federal and state law at public schools, public libraries, health facilities operated by the state or a political subdivision of the state, courthouses, Division of Labor Standards Enforcement facilities, the Agricultural Labor Relations Board, the Division of Workers' Compensation, and shelters and ensure that they remain safe and accessible to all California residents, regardless of immigration status. The act requires all public schools, health facilities operated by the state or a political subdivision of the state, and courthouses to implement the model policy or an equivalent policy. This bill would require the Attorney General, on or before October 30, 2027, and annually thereafter, to submit to the Legislature and the Governor, and post on its internet website, a report that includes, among other things, a summary of all immigration enforcement incidents and activities occurring on or after September 1, 2025, conducted by a person at a designated location that have been reported by the designated location or a person who witnessed the activity to the Attorney General, as specified. The bill would authorize the Attorney General to request representatives of a designated location to furnish any reported immigration enforcement incidents and activities as part of compiling its annual report and would authorize the Attorney General to issue civil penalties or conduct other enforcement activity to ensure compliance with these provisions. The bill would prohibit the report from including any personally identifiable information regarding an individual stopped, detained, or arrested by an individual conducting an immigration enforcement activity. The bill would define "designated location" to mean schoolsites, health care provider entities, shelters, polling places, state courthouses, public transportation access points, and state and local government property. The bill would define "immigration enforcement" for these purposes to mean an effort to investigate, enforce, or assist in the investigation or enforcement of a federal civil or criminal immigration lawsuit. To the extent the bill would impose duties on locals, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Aug 2026
Senate Passage
May 2026
Assembly Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2026
Last action Aug 13, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 5 comparisons
What changed between versions
06/24/26 - Amended Assembly
→
SB1257
·
2 edits
MINOR
This diff reflects a transition from the Assembly-amended version (which included strikethrough markup showing changes from prior Senate amendments) to the final clean bill text as published on the legislature's website. The substantive policy content is unchanged between the two versions; the differences are primarily presentational, involving removal of amendment tracking markup and reformatting for web display.
TECHNICAL
The bill moved from a traditional legislative document format with amendment strikethrough markup to a clean web-published format. The old version showed struck-through text indicating prior changes (e.g., the original Government Code Section 7284.9 placement was replaced by Penal Code Section 11012), while the new version presents only the final operative text.
Web navigation elements (skip to content, home, accessibility, FAQ, search, bill information links) were added as part of the website presentation layer. These are not substantive legislative changes.
Floor votes · Senate May 26, 2026
How they voted
29–8
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 40
May 26, 2026
D
Democratic30
96% Yea
R
Republican10
80% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
11
Committee
6
Amendments
6
Aug 13, 2026
Lower · Passed
August 13 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
lower
Jul 1, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 3.) (June 30). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 24, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 24, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (June 23). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 8, 2026
Committee
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and JUD.
lower
May 26, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 29. Noes 8. Page 4441.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 14, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 4271.) (May 14).
upper
Apr 16, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 15, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 1. Page 3869.) (April 14).
upper
Apr 6, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Mar 25, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Mar 24, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 4. Noes 1. Page 3661.) (March 24).
upper
Mar 4, 2026
Committee
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and JUD.
upper
Feb 19, 2026
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
JA
Jesse Arreguín
DDemocratic
Co
Akilah Weber Pierson
DDemocratic
Co
SP
Sasha Pérez
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1257
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1257. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline