SB 1246 California Senate · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Autonomous vehicles.

Summary
(1) Existing law authorizes the operation of an autonomous vehicle on public roads for testing purposes by a driver who possesses the proper class of license for the type of vehicle operated if specified requirements are satisfied. Existing law prohibits the operation of an autonomous vehicle on public roads until the manufacturer submits an application to the Department of Motor Vehicles (department) , as specified, and that application is approved. Existing law requires the department to adopt regulations setting forth requirements for the submission and approval of an application, including, among other things, any testing, equipment, and performance standards the department concludes are necessary to ensure the safe operation of autonomous vehicles on public roads, as specified. Existing law requires manufacturers of autonomous vehicles that operate without a human operator physically present in the vehicle, except as provided, to comply with certain requirements, including, among other things, to maintain a dedicated emergency response telephone line that is available for emergency response officials and to equip each autonomous vehicle with a 2-way voice communication device that enables emergency response officials who are near the vehicle to communicate effectively with a remote human operator, as specified. Under existing law, an "emergency response official" includes, but is not limited to, emergency dispatchers, peace officers, as specified, and first responders. This bill would require manufacturers of autonomous vehicles to maintain communications capacity sufficient to support the maximum number of concurrent remote assistance or teleoperations sessions, as specified. The bill would require remote drivers to be located within the United States and hold a driver's license that is valid for operation in California, is of the appropriate class, and includes any required endorsements. The bill would require an autonomous vehicle manufacturer to ensure, through its staffing and assignments, that local incident technicians are immediately dispatched upon notification, electronically or otherwise, of a crash or other incident or upon receiving a request from an emergency response official or 911 dispatch center. The bill would, in the event of a fleetwide emergency or system failure that may create a traffic hazard or impeded emergency response, require an autonomous vehicle manufacturer to immediately notify affected local jurisdictions, including emergency dispatch, of the location and status of their fleet and deploy local incident technicians, where appropriate, whenever affected vehicles cannot be remotely recovered. The bill would require the department, on or before July 1, 2028, to adopt guidelines establishing reasonable response times for local incident technicians to be present at the scene upon the request of an emergency response official or 911 dispatch center. The bill would expand the definition of "emergency response official" for these purposes to also include traffic control, traffic enforcement, and parking enforcement personnel from a public agency in an applicable jurisdiction. The bill would require autonomous vehicle manufacturers, for an autonomous vehicle that operates as a commercial vehicle and that is not equipped with manual controls for completing the dynamic driving task, to ensure that remote assistants or remote drivers have the ability to place the autonomous vehicle in neutral to allow an emergency response official to move the vehicle, cause the autonomous vehicle to move as directed by an emergency response official, or turn off the vehicle and have it remain stationary until otherwise directed by an emergency response official. The bill would require autonomous vehicle manufacturers to maintain data on response times of local incident technicians and responses to fleetwide emergencies or system failures, emergency events, immobilizations, obstructions, crashes, and requests from emergency response officials. The bill would require autonomous vehicle manufacturers to provide this data to the department quarterly and would require the department to publish summary statistics on its internet website, as specified. The bill would authorize the department to share records with the Public Utilities Commission to support regulatory oversight of autonomous vehicle passenger service operations. The bill would specify that a violation of the above provisions is not a crime. The bill would authorize a city attorney or county counsel to bring a civil action on behalf of a city, county, or city and county to enforce specified violations of the above provisions. The bill would authorize a court to impose specified civil penalties payable to the jurisdiction bringing the action, as specified. (2) Existing law establishes the Commission on Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) within the Department of Justice and requires the commission to develop guidelines and implement courses of instruction regarding specified topics, including, among others, racial profiling, handling domestic violence, and human trafficking. This bill would require POST to develop uniform guidelines and requirements for, and to provide approval of, the training and written guidance required to be provided by autonomous vehicle manufacturers. The bill would authorize POST to impose fees sufficient to cover the reasonable regulatory costs associated with administering these provisions. The bill would require POST to implement a course or courses of instruction for voluntary training of law enforcement officers, as defined, on autonomous vehicles that operate as commercial vehicles as it relates to public safety and to develop related uniform minimum guidelines for voluntary use by California law enforcement agencies, as specified. The bill would require the course or courses, learning and performance objectives, training standards, and guidelines to be developed in consultation with appropriate groups and individuals that have an interest and expertise in the field of the operation of autonomous vehicles, as specified. (3) The bill would make its provisions operative July 1, 2028.
Bill status passed both 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Aug 2026
Senate Passage
May 2026
Assembly Passage
Aug 2026
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2026 Last action Aug 30, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 6 comparisons

What changed between versions

08/21/26 - Amended Assembly SB1246 · 7 edits
MODERATE
SB 1246 (Autonomous Vehicles) was amended in the Assembly with several substantive changes to how autonomous vehicle manufacturers must respond to incidents, report data, and staff their operations. Key changes include a narrower definition of 'fleetwide emergency,' broader triggers for dispatching local incident technicians, a requirement for quarterly data reporting instead of upon-request, and a sunset provision for an existing section. The bill also tightens the driver's license requirement for remote drivers from any U.S. state to specifically California-valid licenses.
DEFINITION

The definition of 'fleetwide emergency or system failure' was narrowed. It previously covered any event affecting multiple vehicles under the same software regardless of location. Now it requires that the event causes or is likely to cause a substantial number of vehicles within a local jurisdiction to become immobilized or unable to operate safely.

ELIGIBILITY

The definition of 'local incident technician' was expanded to include tow truck operators who have contracts with CHP, local law enforcement, DOT, or local transportation agencies for towing or vehicle storage services, in addition to manufacturers employing 50 or more technicians.

The driver's license requirement for remote drivers was tightened. Previously they needed a valid driver's license from any U.S. state or territory of the appropriate class. Now they must hold a license that is specifically valid for operation in California, of the appropriate class, with any required endorsements.

REQUIREMENT

The trigger for dispatching a local incident technician was broadened. Previously it required notification of an 'accident involving damage to persons or property.' Now it also covers any crash or incident where the vehicle becomes immobilized, obstructs traffic or emergency access, creates a roadway hazard, or requires onsite assistance for safe and timely removal.

Data reporting requirements changed from providing records 'upon request' to submitting them quarterly in a manner acceptable to the DMV. The DMV is now also required to publish summary statistics broken down by manufacturer on its website.

TIMELINE

A sunset provision was added to Section 38751 (the existing law section on emergency response requirements). It will become inoperative on July 1, 2028 and be repealed as of January 1, 2029, meaning the new provisions in the bill will fully replace it at that point.

SCOPE

The chapter containing operational requirements was renumbered from Chapter 2 to Chapter 3 (commencing with Section 38800) of Division 16.6 of the Vehicle Code, and multiple sections were renumbered accordingly (38801 through 38807).

Floor votes · Senate May 27, 2026 · Assembly Aug 31, 2026

How they voted

279
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 40
May 27, 2026
D Democratic30
26 Yea 1 Nay 3
86% Yea
R Republican10
1 Yea 8 Nay 1
80% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
31
Key actions
14
Committee
7
Amendments
8
Aug 31, 2026
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (64-11-3)
assembly
Aug 30, 2026
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 30, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Aug 21, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Aug 13, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (August 13).
lower
Jul 2, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (July 1). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 24, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on C. & C.
lower
Jun 23, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on C. & C. (Ayes 13. Noes 2.) (June 22).
lower
Jun 15, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Jun 4, 2026
Committee
Referred to Coms. on TRANS., C. & C., and JUD.
lower
May 27, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 27. Noes 9. Page 4503.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 18, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
May 18, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 4270.) (May 14).
upper
Apr 22, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 3. Page 3979.) (April 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 15, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 8, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 8. Noes 3. Page 3761.) (April 7). Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Mar 24, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
upper
Mar 4, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
upper
Feb 19, 2026
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Dave Cortese
Dave Cortese
DDemocratic
CA
15