Advance health care directive of a skilled nursing facility patient.
Summary
Existing law, the Health Care Decisions Law, provides for the creation, form, and revocation of advance health care directives, and authorizes an adult having capacity to give an individual health care instruction. Under existing law, the advance health care directive of a patient in a skilled nursing facility is not effective unless a patient advocate or ombudsman signs the advance directive as a witness and declares that they are serving as a witness pursuant to this requirement. Existing law authorizes a witness who is a patient advocate or ombudsman to rely on the representations of the administrators or staff of the skilled nursing facility, or of family members, as convincing evidence of the identity of the patient, as specified. This bill would delete a patient advocate from the above-described witness duties, thus requiring that an ombudsman witness the advance health care directive of a patient in a skilled nursing facility.
Bill status
passed both
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Jun 2026
Senate Passage
Jul 2026
Assembly Passage
Jun 2026
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2026
Last action Jul 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
06/04/26 - Amended Assembly
→
SB1189
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes occurred between these two versions of SB 1189. The differences are entirely formatting and presentation: the first version includes line numbers, page numbers, and a plain-text layout, while the second version reflects a web-page rendering with navigation elements, search tools, and restructured headings. The actual legal text of Section 4675 of the Probate Code is identical in both versions.
TECHNICAL
Formatting and layout changes only: removal of line numbers and page numbers, addition of website navigation elements (search, bill information links, share options), and restructured heading hierarchy. No changes to the substantive legal text.
Floor votes · Senate Apr 16, 2026 · Assembly Jun 16, 2026
How they voted
38–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 40
Apr 16, 2026
D
Democratic30
96% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
8
Committee
5
Amendments
2
Jul 2, 2026
Upper · Passed
Action rescinded whereby bill was read third time, passed, and ordered to the Senate.
upper
Jun 16, 2026
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (76-0-2)
assembly
Jun 16, 2026
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jun 15, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 5706.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Jun 9, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (June 9).
lower
Jun 4, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
May 11, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 16, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 3920.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
Apr 13, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Mar 24, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0. Page 3659.) (March 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 4, 2026
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and APPR.
upper
Feb 19, 2026
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1189
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1189. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline