State funds: grant programs: loan programs: eligibility.

The bill text was reformatted from a traditional legislative document layout (with line numbers, page headers like '95 SB 1171 -2-', and a block amendment history) to a web-based presentation format with navigation elements, search fields, and version history links. No policy content was altered.

New subsection (b) of Section 8336 requires each private entity applying to a covered program to identify all subcontractors to be used under the contract and certify to the administrator that those subcontractors do not contract with ICE. This creates an affirmative disclosure and certification obligation on applicants.

The eligibility requirement in Section 8336 (now subsection (c)) was expanded from prohibiting only the private entity itself from contracting with ICE to also prohibiting its subcontractors from contracting with ICE. The text now reads 'an eligible private entity and its subcontractors for each covered program, if any, shall not contract with United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement.'

A new Section 4 was added stating that no reimbursement is required under Article XIII B of the California Constitution for certain costs because the act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates one, or changes the penalty or definition of a crime (per Government Code Section 17556). However, if the Commission on State Mandates finds other state-mandated costs exist, reimbursement is still required. This narrows the scope of potential state reimbursement obligations to local agencies.

Minor formatting changes throughout: page numbers shifted from 97 to 96, some numeric values in findings changed from words to numerals (e.g., '11 million' to '11,000,000'), and dollar amounts reformatted (e.g., '$275 billion' to '$275-billion'). The legislative counsel's digest was updated to reflect the new subcontractor provisions.

Removed the amendment to Section 102 of the Food and Agricultural Code, which made a nonsubstantive change to provisions about the Secretary of Food and Agriculture. The bill no longer touches that code section.

Added new Section 8337 providing that the chapter does not apply to grants or loans for which an application was submitted, or an award or issuance was made, before July 1, 2027. This creates a one-year-plus grace period so entities with pending applications or already-awarded funds are not retroactively affected.

Fiscal committee determination changed from 'no' to 'yes,' and state-mandated local program changed from 'no' to 'yes,' indicating the bill now imposes costs on local agencies that trigger the state reimbursement process under Part 7 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Government Code.

Fixed a typo in the findings: 'Immigrant also' corrected to 'Immigrants also.' Various line number and formatting adjustments throughout.

Adds a new Chapter 5.3 (Sections 8335-8336) to Division 1 of Title 2 of the Government Code establishing state loan and grant eligibility restrictions tied to ICE contracting.

Section 3 declares the new chapter addresses a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair, meaning it applies to all cities including charter cities.

Section 8336(a) prohibits any administrator of a covered program (grant or loan program using state funds) from awarding a grant or issuing a loan to a private entity that contracts with ICE.

Section 8336(b) requires administrators to include in their eligibility requirements that an eligible private entity shall not contract with ICE, making this a standing condition for all covered programs.

Defines key terms: 'administrator' (state agency, local agency, or third-party contractor), 'covered program' (grant or loan program using state funds), 'private entity' (sole proprietorship, partnership, LLC, corporation, nonprofit, or other nongovernmental entity), and 'third-party contractor' (including grant recipients who must redistribute funds to nonprofits).

Fiscal note changed from 'Fiscal committee: no' to 'Fiscal committee: yes' and 'State-mandated local program: no' to 'State-mandated local program: yes,' indicating the bill now triggers fiscal review and potential state mandate reimbursement obligations.

Adds extensive legislative findings (Section 1, subsections a through u) documenting the economic impact of immigration on California, ICE enforcement tactics, detention conditions, deaths in custody, and the rationale for restricting state funds to entities contracting with ICE.