SB 1097 California Senate · 2025-2026 Regular Session

California Environmental Quality Act: electrical distribution: exemptions.

Summary
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of an environmental impact report (EIR) on a project that the lead agency proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. This bill would exempt from CEQA projects that consist of the inspection, maintenance, repair, restoration, reconditioning, reconductoring with advanced conductors, replacement, or removal of an existing transmission wire or cable used to conduct electricity or other piece of equipment that is directly attached to the wire or cable and that meet certain requirements, including, among other things, that for a project that is not located on a sensitiva site, the project is undertaken entirely within an existing right-of-way. For projects that are located on a sensitive site, as defined, the bill would also require that the project not increase the footprint of the existing transmission line by more than 10%. In addition to those requirements, for projects that are located within a national park, a national monument, a national wilderness area, or a national recreation area, the bill would also require that the existing right-of-way that the project is undertaken within have a certified EIR, negative declaration, or mitigated negative declaration. For any of these above-described projects that are undertaken within a private right-of-way, the bill would require the project applicant to obtain permission from each underlying property owner to access the property for the project and to enter into an agreement to restore the right-of-way to its condition before the commencement of the project. If a lead agency determines that a project is exempt from CEQA pursuant to the above-described provision, the bill would require the lead agency to file a notice of exemption with the Office of Land Use and Climate Innovation and the county clerk in each county in which the project is located, as provided. By increasing the duties of a lead agency, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status in committee 1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 13, 2026 Last action May 14, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons

What changed between versions

02/13/26 - Introduced 03/25/26 - Amended Senate · 9 edits · Mar 25, 2026
MAJOR
The bill was transformed from a one-section placeholder expressing legislative intent to streamline energy permitting into a full CEQA reform bill that adds two new sections to the Public Resources Code. The most significant change is Section 21080.80, which replaces the 'fair argument' standard with a 'more likely than not' substantial evidence standard for determining whether an environmental impact report is required for solar, wind, energy storage, non-fossil thermal powerplants, and associated transmission lines. This makes it substantially harder to force full EIRs on clean energy projects and imposes a 270-day deadline on judicial challenges.
SCOPE

Added Section 21080.39 creating a CEQA exemption for inspection, maintenance, repair, restoration, reconditioning, reconductoring with advanced conductors, replacement, or removal of transmission wires/cables and directly attached equipment, provided the work is within an existing right-of-way and the applicant agrees in writing to restore the right-of-way.

Added Section 21080.80 establishing a modified CEQA approval process specifically for solar photovoltaic powerplants, terrestrial wind powerplants, energy storage systems, stationary non-fossil thermal powerplants, and overhead transmission lines connecting those facilities to the grid.

The original single-section intent bill (expressing intent to enact future legislation) was retained but moved to the end, and the bill now contains four substantive sections of operative law in addition to that intent statement.

REQUIREMENT

Replaced the 'fair argument' standard with a 'more likely than not' substantial evidence standard: an EIR is only required if the lead agency determines based on substantial evidence that it is more likely than not the project will have a significant environmental effect. Public controversy alone cannot trigger an EIR requirement.

DEFINITION

Defined 'substantial evidence' to include fact, reasonable assumptions predicated on fact, and expert opinion supported by fact, while explicitly excluding argument, speculation, unsubstantiated opinion, clearly inaccurate evidence, and social or economic impacts not caused by physical environmental impacts.

ELIGIBILITY

Established an extensive list of excluded locations where the modified process does not apply, including state parks, wilderness areas, marine protected areas, national parks, wetlands (within 300 feet), prime farmland, very high fire hazard severity zones, conservation easements, coastal environmentally sensitive areas, and hazardous waste sites (with narrow exceptions).

TIMELINE

Imposed a 270-day deadline for resolution of any judicial action or proceeding brought to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the adoption of a negative declaration or project approval under this section, including appeals to the court of appeal or Supreme Court.

ENFORCEMENT

Provided that if a court sets aside a project condition that was necessary to avoid significant environmental effects, the lead agency's approval is invalid and a new environmental review must be conducted, unless the lead agency substitutes an equivalent or more effective condition after a public hearing.

FISCAL

Changed fiscal committee designation from 'no' to 'yes' and state-mandated local program from 'no' to 'yes', reflecting that the new duties imposed on lead agencies constitute a state-mandated local program. Added a no-reimbursement provision based on local authority to levy service charges.

Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
14
Key actions
5
Committee
4
Amendments
3
May 14, 2026
Upper · Passed
May 14 hearing: Held in committee and under submission.
upper
Apr 23, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 22, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 17. Noes 0. Page 3973.) (April 21).
upper
Apr 15, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on E., U & C. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 3900.) (April 15). Re-referred to Com. on E., U & C.
upper
Apr 8, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on E.Q. and E., U & C.
upper
Mar 25, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 26, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Feb 13, 2026
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor

Sponsors