California Environmental Quality Act: electrical distribution: exemptions.
What changed between versions
Added Section 21080.39 creating a CEQA exemption for inspection, maintenance, repair, restoration, reconditioning, reconductoring with advanced conductors, replacement, or removal of transmission wires/cables and directly attached equipment, provided the work is within an existing right-of-way and the applicant agrees in writing to restore the right-of-way.
Added Section 21080.80 establishing a modified CEQA approval process specifically for solar photovoltaic powerplants, terrestrial wind powerplants, energy storage systems, stationary non-fossil thermal powerplants, and overhead transmission lines connecting those facilities to the grid.
The original single-section intent bill (expressing intent to enact future legislation) was retained but moved to the end, and the bill now contains four substantive sections of operative law in addition to that intent statement.
Replaced the 'fair argument' standard with a 'more likely than not' substantial evidence standard: an EIR is only required if the lead agency determines based on substantial evidence that it is more likely than not the project will have a significant environmental effect. Public controversy alone cannot trigger an EIR requirement.
Defined 'substantial evidence' to include fact, reasonable assumptions predicated on fact, and expert opinion supported by fact, while explicitly excluding argument, speculation, unsubstantiated opinion, clearly inaccurate evidence, and social or economic impacts not caused by physical environmental impacts.
Established an extensive list of excluded locations where the modified process does not apply, including state parks, wilderness areas, marine protected areas, national parks, wetlands (within 300 feet), prime farmland, very high fire hazard severity zones, conservation easements, coastal environmentally sensitive areas, and hazardous waste sites (with narrow exceptions).
Imposed a 270-day deadline for resolution of any judicial action or proceeding brought to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the adoption of a negative declaration or project approval under this section, including appeals to the court of appeal or Supreme Court.
Provided that if a court sets aside a project condition that was necessary to avoid significant environmental effects, the lead agency's approval is invalid and a new environmental review must be conducted, unless the lead agency substitutes an equivalent or more effective condition after a public hearing.
Changed fiscal committee designation from 'no' to 'yes' and state-mandated local program from 'no' to 'yes', reflecting that the new duties imposed on lead agencies constitute a state-mandated local program. Added a no-reimbursement provision based on local authority to levy service charges.