Health care decisions: life-sustaining treatment.
Summary
Existing law defines a request regarding resuscitative measures to mean a written document, signed by an individual with capacity or legally recognized health care decisionmaker and the individual's physician that directs a health care provider regarding resuscitative measures, as prescribed. Existing law includes a prehospital "do not resuscitate" form, as developed by the Emergency Medical Services Authority or other substantially similar form, and Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment form (POLST form) , as approved by the Emergency Medical Services Authority as requests regarding resuscitative measures. This bill would replace the term "Physician Orders for Life Sustaining Treatment" with "POLST," or "Portable Orders Listing Scope of Treatment." The bill would authorize a request regarding resuscitative measures to be entered into by an individual with capacity or a health care agent, conservator with health care decisionmaking authority, or surrogate, as defined, and a physician, nurse practitioner, or physician assistant, as specified. The bill would specify that a request regarding resuscitative measures is entirely voluntary and the provision of care or admission to a facility cannot be conditioned on completion of or refusal to complete a POLST or prehospital "do not resuscitate" order. Existing law prescribes requirements for forms for requests regarding resuscitative measures, including, among other things, that the form be signed by the executing parties. The bill would specify that an electronic signature, as defined, is sufficient for any signature required for a request regarding resuscitative measures. Under this bill, a request regarding resuscitative measures executed in another state or jurisdiction that complies with the laws of that state or jurisdiction or the laws of California is considered valid and enforceable in California to the same extent as a request regarding resuscitative measures validly executed in California. The bill would specify that, in the absence of knowledge to the contrary, a physician or other health care provider may presume that a request regarding resuscitative measures, whether executed in another state or jurisdiction or in California, is valid and unrevoked. The bill would make conforming changes.
Bill status
passed both
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Jun 2026
Senate Passage
May 2026
Assembly Passage
Jun 2026
Governor
Introduced Feb 13, 2026
Last action Aug 27, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 4 comparisons
What changed between versions
08/30/26 - Enrolled
→
SB1088
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes occurred between these two versions. The diff reflects a reformatting of the enrolled bill from a traditional legislative document layout (with page numbers, centered headers, and signature blocks) into a web page presentation for the California Legislature website. All nine sections of the bill text and the legislative counsel's digest are identical in content.
TECHNICAL
The bill was reformatted from a printed legislative document style (with page numbers like 'SB 1088 -2-', centered titles, and signature lines for the Governor) into a web page layout with navigation menus, search bars, and a status timeline showing amendment dates. No changes to the actual statutory text were made.
Floor votes · Senate May 18, 2026 · Assembly Jun 30, 2026
How they voted
38–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 40
May 18, 2026
D
Democratic30
96% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
10
Committee
5
Amendments
5
Aug 27, 2026
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 39. Noes 0.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Jun 30, 2026
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (72-0-6)
assembly
Jun 30, 2026
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Jun 29, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 5926.) Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Jun 23, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (June 23).
lower
Jun 18, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Jun 17, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on JUD. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (June 16).
lower
May 26, 2026
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and JUD.
lower
May 18, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 38. Noes 0. Page 4306.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
Apr 29, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 0. Page 4085.) (April 28).
upper
Apr 9, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 11. Noes 0. Page 3793.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Mar 17, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
Feb 26, 2026
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HEALTH and JUD.
upper
Feb 13, 2026
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Catherine Blakespear
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1088
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1088. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline