SB 1087 California Senate · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Transportation planning: sustainable communities strategies: transportation funding programs.

Summary
(1) Existing law requires certain transportation planning agencies to prepare and adopt regional transportation plans directed at achieving a coordinated and balanced regional transportation system. Existing law requires a regional transportation plan to include a policy element, a sustainable communities strategy prepared by a metropolitan planning organization, an action element, and a financial element, as provided. Existing law requires those transportation planning agencies to adopt and submit every 4 years, except as provided, an updated regional transportation plan to the California Transportation Commission and the Department of Transportation. Existing law requires a sustainable communities strategy to achieve regional targets set by the State Air Resources Board for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions from the automobile and light truck sector in the region for 2020 and 2035, respectively, and requires the state board to update those targets every 8 years, consistent with each metropolitan planning organization's timeframe for updating its regional transportation plan, as specified. Existing law establishes certain procedural requirements for setting and updating those targets and authorizes the state board to revise the targets every 4 years based on changes in specified factors. Existing law, to the extent the sustainable communities strategy is unable to achieve the greenhouse gas emission reduction targets, requires a metropolitan planning organization to prepare an alternative planning strategy to the sustainable communities strategy showing how the targets would be achieved through alternative development patterns, infrastructure, or additional transportation measures or policies. Existing law requires the state board to review each metropolitan planning organization's sustainable communities strategy and alternative planning strategy to determine whether the strategy, if implemented, would achieve the greenhouse gas emission reduction targets. This bill would revise and recast the requirements for a sustainable communities strategy, including, among other things, (A) requiring a sustainable communities strategy every 8 years with a progress report after 4 years instead of requiring a sustainable communities strategy every 4 years, (B) requiring the state board to provide each region with greenhouse gas emission reduction targets for 2035 and 2045, and (C) requiring the state board to hold technical workshops before providing those targets. The bill would also revise the state board's process for reviewing sustainable communities strategies and alternative planning strategies, as specified. Because the bill would expand duties of local agencies, it would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law requires, commencing January 1, 2020, the San Diego Association of Governments to begin developing an implementation report that tracks the implementation of its most recently adopted sustainable communities strategy, as provided. Existing law requires the Sacramento Area Council of Governments to report on the regional implementation of its most recently adopted sustainable communities strategy, as provided. This bill would repeal those provisions. (3) Existing law requires the Department of Transportation to prepare the California Transportation Plan for submission to the Governor and the Legislature as a long-range planning document that incorporates various elements and is consistent with specified expressions of legislative intent. Existing law requires the plan to identify the statewide integrated multimodal transportation system needed to achieve statewide greenhouse gas emission reduction targets and to attain state and national air quality standards. This bill would also require the plan to, among other things, incorporate performance measures into planning that informs delivery of transportation capital projects to help achieve the goals of the plan. The bill would, commencing with the 3rd update to the plan, revise the information that the department is required to include in the plan to include, among others, relevant performance measures within each district of the department. (4) Existing law requires certain funds appropriated by the Legislature from the Public Transportation Account to be made available for specified purposes, including, among other purposes, for the department's planning activities, mass transportation responsibilities, and assistance in regional transportation planning, as specified. This bill, for any activities within the region of a metropolitan planning organization, would require the department to limit funding to activities that are consistent with an applicable sustainable communities strategy or alternative planning strategy, as specified. (5) Existing law creates the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Program to address deferred maintenance on the state highway system and the local street and road system. Existing law provides for the deposit of various moneys for the program into the Road Maintenance and Rehabilitation Account. Existing law requires funds in the account to be allocated for various purposes, including, among others, $25,000,000, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for local planning grants to encourage local and regional planning that furthers state goals, as provided. Existing law requires the department to develop a grant guide for the allocation of these grants. This bill, for areas within a metropolitan planning organization, would require the grant guide to encourage planning that furthers the goals of a sustainable communities strategy or alternative planning strategy. (6) Existing law requires the commission, under a program commonly known as the Trade Corridor Enhancement Program, to allocate certain state and federal funds to infrastructure projects located on or along specified transportation corridors. Existing law establishes the Solutions for Congested Corridors Program and requires the commission to allocate state funds made available to the program to projects designed to achieve a balanced set of transportation, environmental, and community access improvements within highly congested travel corridors throughout the state. Under both programs, existing law requires projects within the boundaries of a metropolitan planning organization to be included in an adopted regional transportation plan that includes a sustainable communities strategy determined by the state board to achieve the region's greenhouse gas emission reduction targets. For purposes of those programs, this bill would instead require, if the metropolitan planning organization has adopted an alternative planning strategy, the projects to meet prescribed requirements, including that the predominant purpose of the project is to implement a specific greenhouse gas emission reduction strategy or addresses an impediment to achieving an applicable greenhouse gas emission reduction target identified in the alternative planning strategy. (7) Existing law requires funding to be available under the Solutions for Congested Corridors Program for projects that make specific performance improvements and are part of a comprehensive corridor plan designed to reduce congestion in highly traveled corridors. Existing law authorizes the department and certain regional transportation planning agencies to nominate projects for funding through the program. This bill would require funding to be available under the program for projects that, among other things, make specific performance improvements and support the implementation of a regional transportation plan. The bill would revise the requirements applicable to a project nomination under the program. The bill would require the commission to allocate program funds to projects that, among other things, are included in an adopted regional transportation plan, as specified. (8) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status passed both 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Aug 2026
Senate Passage
May 2026
Assembly Passage
Aug 2026
Governor
Introduced Feb 13, 2026 Last action Aug 30, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 5 comparisons

What changed between versions

08/21/26 - Amended Assembly SB1087 · 6 edits
MODERATE
The final enrolled version of SB 1087 makes several substantive adjustments to the sustainable communities strategy framework compared to the prior amended assembly version. The most notable changes include a one-year delay in when metropolitan planning organizations must begin using the new 8-year strategy cycle (from January 1, 2027 to January 1, 2028), the addition of a feasibility qualifier to target-setting requirements, expanded factors that the state board must consider when establishing regional greenhouse gas targets, and extended review periods for technical methodology and strategy submissions. These changes collectively give local agencies more time to prepare and make the target-setting process less rigid while increasing transparency.
TIMELINE

The start date for the 8-year sustainable communities strategy cycle was delayed from January 1, 2027 to January 1, 2028, giving metropolitan planning organizations an additional year before they must transition from the existing 4-year cycle.

The state board's review period for a metropolitan planning organization's technical methodology submission was extended from 30 days to 60 days.

The state board's review period after receiving a sustainable communities strategy or alternative planning strategy was extended from 30 days to 60 days.

REQUIREMENT

The requirement for how greenhouse gas emission reduction targets must be set was changed from 'shall do both of the following' to 'all of the following to the extent feasible and based on reasonably available information,' adding a flexibility qualifier that acknowledges practical limitations in target-setting.

A new requirement was added for the state board to identify the material considerations that informed its determination before establishing regional greenhouse gas emission reduction targets, increasing transparency in the target-setting process.

The list of factors the state board must consider when setting targets was significantly expanded to explicitly name cities, counties, special districts, county transportation agencies, air districts, metropolitan planning organizations, and the federal government as entities whose policies and investments should be considered, and added housing and development conditions, geographic characteristics, and reasonably foreseeable state and federal actions.

Floor votes · Senate May 27, 2026 · Assembly Aug 31, 2026

How they voted

313
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 40
May 27, 2026
D Democratic30
30 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican10
1 Yea 3 Nay 6
30% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
31
Key actions
12
Committee
6
Amendments
6
Aug 31, 2026
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (46-18-14)
assembly
Aug 30, 2026
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 30, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Aug 21, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended.
lower
Aug 13, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 11. Noes 4.) (August 13).
lower
Jun 30, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 2.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 25, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Jun 4, 2026
Committee
Referred to Coms. on TRANS. and NAT. RES.
lower
May 27, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 31. Noes 3. Page 4486.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 14, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 4264.) (May 14).
upper
Apr 22, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 1. Page 3985.) (April 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 9, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
upper
Apr 8, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on TRANS. (Ayes 5. Noes 0. Page 3792.) (April 8).
upper
Mar 25, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Feb 26, 2026
Committee
Referred to Coms. on E.Q. and TRANS.
upper
Feb 13, 2026
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Christopher Cabaldon
Christopher Cabaldon
DDemocratic
CA
3