Criminal procedure.
Summary
Existing law requires a prosecuting attorney to disclose to the defendant or their attorney all relevant real evidence seized or obtained as a part of the investigation of the offenses charged that is in the possession of the prosecuting attorney or known to be in the possession of the investigating agencies. Existing law requires the disclosures to be made at least 30 days prior to the trial, unless good cause is shown why a disclosure should be denied, restricted, or deferred. Existing law prohibits an attorney from disclosing or permitting to be disclosed to a defendant, members of the defendant's family, or anyone else copies of child pornography evidence, unless specifically permitted to do so by the court after a hearing and a showing of good cause. Existing law authorizes an attorney to disclose or permit to be disclosed copies of child pornography evidence to persons employed by the attorney or to persons appointed by the court to assist in the preparation of a defendant's case if that disclosure is required for that preparation. This bill would require the court, in specified criminal cases involving sexually explicit material depicting an adult victim, to issue a protective order governing the disclosure of that material, with conditions sufficient to safeguard the victim's privacy, prevent unnecessary copying, transmission, or dissemination of the material, and ensure the defendant's right to a fair trial and a meaningful opportunity to participate in their own defense. This bill would, if the court issues that protective order, prohibit the parties from disclosing to any person copies of sexually explicit material depicting an adult victim, unless specifically permitted to do so by the protective order. The bill would authorize an attorney for any party to disclose or permit to be disclosed copies of sexually explicit material depicting an adult victim subject to the protective order, to a person necessary for the preparation of the case, including the defendant. The bill would, if a party receives any other sexually explicit material of the adult victim, require the party to notify the court for inclusion of the material in any existing protective order, or inclusion in a new or separate protective order. By increasing duties on local prosecutors, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would clarify that these provisions do not relieve the prosecution from the duty to disclose the existence of any relevant or exculpatory evidence nor affect the admissibility of any relevant evidence in court. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status
passed both
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Jul 2026
Senate Passage
May 2026
Assembly Passage
Aug 2026
Governor
Introduced Feb 12, 2026
Last action Aug 28, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 5 comparisons
What changed between versions
08/25/26 - Enrolled
→
SB1056
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes between these two versions. The diff reflects a change in document format from the formal enrolled bill (with Senate/Assembly passage dates and Governor's signature block) to a web page rendering of the same bill text from the California Legislature website. The actual legislative language of Section 1054.11 and the state mandates reimbursement provision are identical in both versions.
TECHNICAL
The document changed from a formal enrolled bill format (with passage dates, signature lines, and page numbers) to a web-based presentation that includes site navigation elements, version history, status timeline, and metadata. No changes to the operative legal text.
Floor votes · Senate May 19, 2026 · Assembly Aug 19, 2026
How they voted
39–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 40
May 19, 2026
D
Democratic30
100% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
10
Committee
4
Amendments
7
Aug 24, 2026
Upper · Passed
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 39. Noes 0.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
upper
Aug 19, 2026
Introduced
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
upper
Aug 19, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate.
lower
Aug 13, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
lower
Aug 13, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (August 13).
lower
Jul 1, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 30). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Jun 24, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
May 26, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
May 19, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 4346.) Ordered to the Assembly.
upper
May 14, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 4263.) (May 14).
upper
Mar 26, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Mar 25, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0. Page 3661.) (March 24).
upper
Feb 26, 2026
Committee
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and APPR.
upper
Feb 12, 2026
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 8 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about SB 1056
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand SB 1056. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline