SB 1011 California Senate · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Energy: Utility Infrastructure AI Safety, Oversight, and Workforce Protection Act.

Summary
Existing law vests the Public Utilities Commission with regulatory jurisdiction over public utilities, including electrical corporations and gas corporations, while local publicly owned electric utilities are under the direction of their governing boards. Existing law requires every public utility to furnish and maintain adequate, efficient, just, and reasonable service, instrumentalities, equipment, and facilities, as are necessary to promote the safety, health, comfort, and convenience of its customers, its employees, and the public. This bill would require the commission, on or before January 1, 2028, to adopt standards for an electrical or gas corporation's use of artificial intelligence models, as provided. The bill would require the commission to direct an electrical or gas corporation to file a plan that demonstrates the corporation's compliance with those standards. The bill would authorize the commission to prohibit an electrical or gas corporation's use of an artificial intelligence model if the commission finds that deployment of the artificial intelligence model would negatively impact the provision of safe, affordable, and reliable electrical or gas service. The bill would require each community choice aggregator and local publicly owned electric utility to adopt a policy regarding its use of an artificial intelligence model that is consistent with the standards. Under existing law, a violation of an order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because a violation of a commission action implementing those requirements would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Additionally, by imposing new duties on local publicly owned electric utilities, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for specified reasons.
Bill status in committee 1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 10, 2026 Last action May 28, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons

What changed between versions

04/22/26 - Amended Senate 05/18/26 - Amended Senate · 8 edits · May 18, 2026
MODERATE
The May 18 amendment fundamentally restructures SB 1011 from a detailed prescriptive regulatory framework into a standards-setting approach. All specific operational requirements (staging periods, incident reporting deadlines, labor notice provisions, enforcement penalties) are removed and replaced with a requirement that the PUC adopt standards by January 1, 2028. The bill also shifts terminology from 'automated decision systems' to 'artificial intelligence models' and narrows direct regulatory obligations primarily to privately owned electrical and gas corporations.
SCOPE

The bill's core approach changed from directly imposing specific operational requirements on utilities to requiring the PUC to adopt standards by January 1, 2028 that will contain those requirements. This gives the commission flexibility to tailor rules through rulemaking rather than fixing them in statute.

Direct regulatory obligations now focus on electrical corporations and gas corporations (privately owned utilities). Community choice aggregators and local publicly owned electric utilities have a lighter obligation to adopt a policy consistent with PUC standards, rather than being subject to the same detailed requirements as privately owned utilities.

REQUIREMENT

All detailed operational sections were removed, including: mandatory 18-month staging mode before deployment, 24-hour incident reporting and 30-day root-cause reports, safety plan filing requirements with specific content (model version, training data, bias testing, cybersecurity controls), system records modification rules, annual monitoring reports, and audit trail retention requirements.

A new standard requirement was added in Section 8511(a)(6) requiring PUC standards to 'identify and establish requirements for human review and approval of any use of artificial intelligence that is high risk, safety sensitive, or would have a material operational impact.' This serves as a catch-all provision.

The workforce protection provision in Section 8511(a)(5) was strengthened: the April version required utilities to self-demonstrate sufficient staffing for human review, while the May version adds that staffing levels must be 'sufficient to support meaningful human review and approval processes, as determined by the commission,' shifting the determination authority to the PUC.

ELIGIBILITY

The 180-day advance notice requirement to labor organizations before introducing technological changes involving AI, the joint retraining program requirement, and the prohibition on layoffs without exhausting retraining/redeployment options were all removed from the bill text.

DEFINITION

The term 'automated decision system' (with its detailed definition and exclusions like spam filters, firewalls, calculators) was replaced with 'artificial intelligence model' defined as an engineered or machine-based system that infers from input how to generate outputs. The definitions for 'high-risk automated decision system,' 'provenance log,' 'staging mode,' 'system records,' 'technological change,' and 'vendor supply chain disclosure' were all removed.

ENFORCEMENT

Specific enforcement provisions were removed, including penalties under Section 2108 and Section 2110 of the Public Utilities Code for privately owned utilities, and the annual compliance certification requirement for publicly owned utilities to their governing board and the Energy Commission.

Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
15
Key actions
5
Committee
2
Amendments
4
May 18, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
May 18, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2. Page 4261.) (May 14).
upper
Apr 22, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Apr 21, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2. Page 3957.) (April 20).
upper
Apr 14, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on P., D.T., & C.P. (Ayes 13. Noes 3. Page 3842.) (April 13). Re-referred to Com. on P., D.T., & C.P.
upper
Feb 18, 2026
Committee
Referred to Coms. on E., U & C. and P., D.T., & C.P.
upper
Feb 10, 2026
Introduced
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
upper
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Jerry McNerney
Jerry McNerney
DDemocratic
CA
5