Mexican prepaid health plans.
Summary
Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care, and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law requires a prepaid health plan to apply for licensure as a health care service plan if the prepaid health plan operating lawfully under the laws of Mexico elects to operate a health care service plan in this state. Existing law requires the application for licensure to demonstrate compliance with specified requirements, including that the prepaid health plan offers and sells in this state only employer-sponsored group plan contracts exclusively for the benefit of Mexican nationals legally employed in the County of San Diego or the County of Imperial, and their dependents, that pay for the delivery of health care services that are provided wholly in Mexico, except as specified. Existing law also requires the application for licensure to demonstrate that the prepaid health plan maintains a tangible net equity of at least $1,000,000 or to demonstrate a reasonable acceptable alternative reimbursement arrangement that the Director of the Department of Managed Health Care is authorized, in the director's discretion, to accept. This bill would modify the above-described requirement that a prepaid health plan offers and sells in this state only employer-sponsored group plan contracts exclusively for the benefit of specified Mexican nationals to additionally include employer-sponsored group plan contracts for the benefit of individuals legally employed in the County of San Diego or the County of Imperial, and for the benefit of their dependents regardless of nationality. The bill would authorize a prepaid health plan operating lawfully under the laws of Mexico that is licensed to operate a health care service plan to offer and sell that employer-sponsored group plan contract only to an employer that provides alternative health care coverage through either a specified full-service health care service plan or a health insurance policy. The bill would modify the above-described requirement that a prepaid health plan maintains a tangible net equity of at least $1,000,000 to instead require a prepaid health plan to maintain a tangible net equity of at least $2,300,000 or to demonstrate an alternative reimbursement arrangement subject to the director's discretion, as described above. Because a willful violation of these provisions by a prepaid health plan, as described above, would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 20, 2025
Last action Feb 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons
What changed between versions
04/28/25 - Amended Assembly
→
AB955
·
1 edit
MINOR
The bill text of AB 955 is substantively unchanged between these two versions. The differences are entirely presentational: the old version uses a traditional printed bill format with line numbers and page headers, while the new version uses a web-based layout with navigation elements, a digest key, and version history. No policy provisions were added, removed, or modified.
TECHNICAL
Presentation format changed from a printed bill layout (with line numbers, page headers like '97' and 'AB 955', and column formatting) to a web-based document layout with navigation links, a digest key section, version history listing, and publication date stamp.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
14
Key actions
5
Committee
8
Amendments
3
Feb 2, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
lower
May 23, 2025
Lower · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
lower
May 21, 2025
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 14, 2025
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 29, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 28, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 24, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 22).
lower
Apr 21, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Apr 10, 2025
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 10, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Feb 21, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
David Alvarez
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 955
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 955. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline