Cold storage facilities.
Summary
Existing law, the Permit Streamlining Act, establishes requirements for the review and approval of applications for development projects, as defined, by public agencies, including requiring that a public agency that is the lead agency for the development project approve or disapprove the project within certain time periods, as specified. This bill would prohibit a city, county, or city and county from approving a building permit for cold storage facilities, as defined, unless the owner of the cold storage facility, or the lessee or operator of the cold storage facility, as specified, establishes a contingency fund, as defined, to be used upon declared national, state, or local emergencies in certain circumstances. Until July 1, 2028, the bill would limit the definition of cold storage facilities for purposes of these provisions to facilities located within the geographic boundaries of the Boyle Heights Community Plan. The bill would require an owner of a cold storage facility to provide evidence of the contingency fund at the discretion of the city, county, or city and county, as specified, and authorize an owner to require the lessee or operator of the cold storage facility to establish and maintain the contingency fund. The bill would require a cold storage facility to use the contingency fund for, among other things, providing support during the declared state of emergency or local emergency for affected communities, as specified. By imposing additional requirements on cities and counties, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The Personal Income Tax Law and the Corporation Tax Law, in modified conformity with federal income tax law, generally define "gross income" for purposes of the taxes imposed by those laws as income from whatever source derived, except as specifically excluded, and provide various exclusions from gross income. This bill would, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2027, and before January 1, 2032, exclude from gross income any amount received by a qualified taxpayer, as defined, in settlement for claims relating to the 2026 Boyle Heights fire incident, as defined. Existing law requires that any bill introduced on or after January 1, 2020, that would authorize certain tax expenditures, as defined, contain, among other things, specific goals that the tax expenditure or exemption will achieve, detailed performance indicators, and data collection requirements. This bill would include additional information required for any bill authorizing a new tax expenditure. The bill would include findings that specified changes proposed by this bill address a matter of statewide concern rather than a municipal affair and, therefore, apply to all cities, including charter cities. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Boyle Heights community. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Aug 2026
Assembly Passage
May 2025
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2025
Last action Aug 28, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 4 comparisons
What changed between versions
08/27/26 - Amended Senate
→
AB817
·
1 edit
MINOR
This diff reflects a formatting and presentation change rather than a substantive policy change. The bill text was reformatted from a traditional legislative document layout (with line numbers, page headers, and footers) into a web page display format with navigation elements. All substantive provisions - the cold storage facility contingency fund requirements, tax exclusions for Boyle Heights fire victims, and legislative findings - remain unchanged between the two versions.
TECHNICAL
The bill text was reformatted from a traditional legislative document with line numbers and page markers into a web page layout including navigation menus (home, FAQ, feedback, sitemap, login) and search tools. No policy language was altered.
Floor votes · Assembly May 8, 2025
How they voted
68–0
Passed · 10 other
Total votes 78
May 8, 2025
D
Democratic59
91% Yea
R
Republican19
73% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
9
Committee
13
Amendments
3
Aug 27, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
upper
Aug 27, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (August 27).
upper
Aug 25, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 3. Noes 1.) (August 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Aug 24, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on REV. & TAX. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (August 24). Re-referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
upper
Aug 20, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and REV. & TAX.
upper
Aug 19, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Aug 19, 2026
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 18, 2026
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 15, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Jun 12, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jun 11, 2026
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
May 21, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
May 8, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 69. Noes 0. Page 1486.)
lower
Apr 30, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (April 30).
lower
Apr 3, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 21. Noes 0.) (April 2). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 3, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
Feb 20, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
MG
Mark González
DDemocratic
Co
Jessica Caloza
DDemocratic
Co
ME
María Elena Durazo
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 817
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 817. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline