State agencies and departments: strategic plans: diversity, equity, and inclusion.
Summary
The State Government Strategic Planning and Performance and Review Act requires each agency, department, office, or commission for which strategic planning efforts are recommended, as specified, to develop a strategic plan and to report to the Governor and the Joint Legislative Budget Committee by April 1 each year on the steps being taken to develop and adopt a strategic plan. The act requires the report to include a description of the elements to be included in the strategic plan, the process for developing and adopting the strategic plan, and the timetable for the plan's completion. This bill would instead require each agency, department, office, or commission subject to the Governor's authority to develop and report on the above-described strategic plan. The bill would also require each agency, department, office, or commission subject to the Governor's authority to, for any strategic plans applicable and if feasible, develop or update the strategic plan to reflect the use of data analysis and inclusive practices to more effectively advance racial equity and to respond to identified disparities with changes to the organization's policies, programs, and operations, among other things.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Aug 2025
Assembly Passage
Jun 2025
Senate Passage
Sep 2025
Vetoed
Oct 2025
Introduced Feb 18, 2025
Vetoed Oct 13, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 6 comparisons
What changed between versions
09/05/25 - Amended Senate
→
09/15/25 - Enrolled
·
3 edits
·
Sep 15, 2025
MINOR
AB 766 moved from the Senate amended version to the enrolled (final) version with one substantive policy change: the requirement for state agencies to engage historically disadvantaged and underserved communities and make strategic plans publicly available was removed. The remaining racial equity provision now carries an 'if feasible' qualifier, making it less mandatory.
Scope change
The bill's scope narrowed slightly: while it still applies to all agencies, departments, offices, or commissions subject to the Governor's authority, the racial equity component is now qualified by 'if feasible' and no longer includes a standalone community engagement and public transparency obligation.
REQUIREMENT
The requirement for each agency, department, office, or commission to engage and gather input from California communities that have been historically disadvantaged and underserved, and to make strategic plans publicly available, was deleted entirely from Section 11818.
The phrase 'and if feasible' was added to the operative text of Section 11818, making the requirement to develop or update strategic plans to reflect data analysis and inclusive practices for racial equity conditional on feasibility rather than absolute.
TECHNICAL
Section 11818 was restructured from a two-part provision (subdivisions (a) and (b)) into a single unbroken paragraph, reflecting the removal of the community engagement requirement.
Floor votes · Senate Sep 10, 2025 · Assembly Jun 3, 2025
How they voted
30–9
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 40
Sep 10, 2025
D
Democratic30
100% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
9
Committee
6
Amendments
9
Jan 22, 2026
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto stricken from file.
lower
Oct 13, 2025
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Oct 13, 2025
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 11, 2025
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 60. Noes 18. Page 3300.).
lower
Sep 10, 2025
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 10, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 30. Noes 9. Page 2800.).
upper
Sep 5, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 29, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
upper
Aug 29, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 29).
upper
Aug 18, 2025
Committee
In committee: Referred to suspense file.
upper
Jul 9, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 8, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 1.) (July 8).
upper
Jun 18, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
Jun 3, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 60. Noes 17. Page 2008.)
lower
May 23, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 23, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 3.) (May 23).
lower
May 14, 2025
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 30, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 15. Noes 5.) (April 30). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 28, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
Feb 19, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
lower
1 primary · 11 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
LaShae Sharp-Collins
DDemocratic
Co
Akilah Weber Pierson
DDemocratic
Co
Corey Jackson
DDemocratic
Co
Isaac Bryan
DDemocratic
Co
Laura Richardson
DDemocratic
Co
Lola Smallwood-Cuevas
DDemocratic
Co
Lori Wilson
DDemocratic
Co
Mia Bonta
DDemocratic
Co
Mike Gipson
DDemocratic
Co
Rhodesia Ransom
DDemocratic
Co
Sade Elhawary
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 766
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 766. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline