AB 747 California Assembly · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Service of Process Accountability, Reform and Equity (SPARE) Act.

Summary
(1) Existing law requires a natural person who, for specific compensation, makes more than 10 services of process within the state in one calendar year, or a corporation or partnership that derives compensation from service of process within the state, to file and maintain a verified certificate of registration as a process server with the county clerk of the county in which the person, corporation, or partnership resides or has its principal place of business, except as specified. Existing law requires each county clerk to maintain a register of process servers and assign a number and issue an identification card to each process server. This bill would, beginning January 1, 2027, require that the register of process servers maintained by a county clerk be publicly available. By imposing a new duty on county clerks, the bill would create a state-mandated local program. (2) Existing law provides that a service of a summons in a civil action that complies with specified procedures is not invalid or ineffective solely because it was made by a person in violation of the requirements pertaining to registered process servers. Existing law provides that if a copy of the summons and complaint cannot with reasonable diligence be personally delivered to the person to be served, the summons may be served by leaving a copy at the person's dwelling house, usual place of abode, usual place of business, or usual mailing address, in the presence of a person who is at least 18 years of age, and by thereafter mailing a copy of the summons and complaint as specified. Existing law also authorizes a summons in an action for unlawful detainer to be served by posting if the court is satisfied that the party to be served cannot with reasonable diligence be served in any authorized manner other than publication, and that other specified conditions are met. Existing law requires the proof of service of a summons to contain specified information and documentation. This bill would define "reasonable diligence," for purposes of service of process in specified civil cases, to mean attempting personal delivery of the summons and complaint, in good faith, on at least three occasions on three different days at three different times. The bill would require the proof of service of a summons and complaint, if served personally, by substituted service, or by posting, if the summons is for an action for unlawful detainer of real property, to include at least one photograph, if such can be obtained without compromising the safety of the process server, of the site of the effectuated or attempted service and contain a readable stamp and global positioning system (GPS) coordinates indicating the date, time, and location of service. The bill would require the process server to provide a detailed statement on the proof of service, as specified, if there is no GPS or cellular signal available at the time and place of the effected or attempted service. The bill would make these requirements operative on January 1, 2027. (3) Existing law authorizes a court, on motion of a party and after notice to the other party, to set aside any void judgment or order. This bill would authorize a party that did not receive proper service of the summons and complaint to bring a motion to set aside or vacate a default or default judgment or for leave to defend the action or to move for dismissal. The bill would require a party that files a motion to set aside or vacate a default or default judgment to proffer evidence that service of the summons and complaint was not effected. The bill would provide that the party seeking the default or default judgment has the burden of proving, by a preponderance of the evidence, that service was lawful. The bill would require the court to take evidence and would require the court to conduct a hearing and receive oral testimony if requested by either party. The bill would specify that the above provisions would not limit any other available remedies under the law. The bill would make these provisions operative on January 1, 2027. (4) Existing law prescribes requirements for civil actions for unlawful detainer filed by landlords to remove tenants from their properties. Existing law requires that certain information be included in the complaint for unlawful detainer, including the method used to serve the defendant with the notice of termination of tenancy. This bill would additionally require the complaint to include information describing the date, time, and location of effected service of the termination notice. The bill would make this requirement operative on January 1, 2027. (5) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Aug 2025
Assembly Passage
Jun 2025
Senate Passage
Sep 2025
Signed into Law
Oct 2025
Introduced Feb 18, 2025 Signed Oct 10, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 7 comparisons

What changed between versions

09/05/25 - Amended Senate 09/15/25 - Enrolled · 5 edits · Sep 15, 2025
MODERATE
The transition from the Amended Senate version to the Enrolled version of AB 747 (SPARE Act) reflects several substantive policy refinements made during final legislative passage. The most significant changes narrow the scope of new service-of-process requirements: the dwelling-house attempt requirement for substituted service was limited to consumer debt collection cases only, an additional exemption was added for housing program participants in unlawful detainer posting, and the photograph/GPS documentation requirement was narrowed to exclude mail service. The burden of proof for challenging default judgments was also reframed from a jurisdictional showing by the plaintiff to a service-lawfulness showing by the party who obtained the default.
ELIGIBILITY

The requirement that at least one substituted service attempt be made at the person's dwelling house or usual place of abode was narrowed from applying to all cases to only actions to collect consumer debt (as defined in Civil Code Section 1788.2).

SCOPE

In unlawful detainer posting (Section 415.45), an additional exemption was added for 'program participants' as defined in Government Code Section 6205.5(a)(9), meaning the dwelling-house attempt requirement does not apply to those cases. A qualifier was also added: the dwelling-house attempt is only required if the address is known or could be determined with reasonable effort.

REQUIREMENT

The photograph and GPS documentation requirement in Section 417.10 was narrowed to exclude service by mail (Section 415.30). Photographs are now only required for personal service, substituted service, and posting in unlawful detainer cases.

ENFORCEMENT

The mechanism for challenging default judgments was revised. The Amended Senate version allowed a 'motion to quash service' and placed the burden on the plaintiff to establish court jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence. The Enrolled version focuses on motions to set aside or vacate a default judgment, requires the moving party to proffer evidence that service was not effected, and places the burden on the party who obtained the default to prove service was lawful by a preponderance of the evidence.

TIMELINE

The public register requirement for process servers (Section 22355) now explicitly states it takes effect beginning January 1, 2027, consistent with the operative dates added throughout the enrolled version.

Floor votes · Senate Sep 9, 2025 · Assembly Jun 4, 2025

How they voted

3010
Passed
Total votes 40
Sep 9, 2025
D Democratic30
30 Yea
100% Yea
R Republican10
10 Nay
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
29
Key actions
11
Committee
10
Amendments
7
Oct 10, 2025
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 11, 2025
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 55. Noes 20. Page 3282.).
lower
Sep 9, 2025
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 9, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 30. Noes 10. Page 2729.).
upper
Sep 5, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 29, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 29).
upper
Aug 25, 2025
Committee
In committee: Referred to suspense file.
upper
Aug 18, 2025
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Aug 7, 2025
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jul 16, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 1.) (July 15). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 18, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 4, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 59. Noes 13. Page 2080.)
lower
May 23, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 23, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 1.) (May 23).
lower
Apr 23, 2025
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file.
lower
Apr 8, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 25, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 24, 2025
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 24, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 19, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Ash Kalra
Ash Kalra
DDemocratic
CA
25