Master of Divinity: physician and surgeon: title.
Summary
Existing law, the Medical Practice Act, establishes the Medical Board of California within the Department of Consumer Affairs and sets forth its powers and duties relating to the licensure and regulation of physicians and surgeons. Existing law prohibits a person from using the words "doctor" or "physician," the letters or prefix "Dr.," the initials "M.D.," or any other terms or letters indicating or implying that the person is a physician and surgeon, physician, surgeon, or practitioner, unless the person has been issued a physician's and surgeon's certificate by the board, and makes a violation of these provisions a crime. This bill would specifically prohibit a person who has earned a Master of Divinity from displaying the title "MDiv" or "M.D.i.v." in a communication or advertisement relating to the person's practice unless the title is clearly distinguishable from the title "MD" or "M.D." The bill would provide that prohibited displays include, but are not limited to, using different colors, fonts, or font sizes in a way that makes the "MD" or "M.D." more prominent than the "iv" or "i.v." The bill would provide that a person who violates this provision is not subject to criminal penalties, as specified.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 14, 2025
Last action Feb 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
02/14/25 - Introduced
→
AB659
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes were made to AB 659 between these two versions. The differences are entirely in document formatting and presentation: the first version is the raw introduced bill text with line numbers, while the second is a web page rendering of the same bill from the California legislature website, including navigation elements and restructured layout.
TECHNICAL
The bill text was reformatted from a plain-text legislative document with line numbers into a web page layout with navigation menus, headers, and different typographic structure. The actual statutory language of Section 600 is identical in both versions.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
9
Key actions
4
Committee
6
Feb 2, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
lower
May 23, 2025
Lower · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
lower
May 21, 2025
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 1, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (April 1). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 3, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & P.
lower
Feb 15, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Marc Berman
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 659
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 659. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline