California Environmental Quality Act: exemption: housing development projects.
Summary
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of an environmental impact report on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA exempts from its requirements various projects, including, but not limited to, housing projects that meet certain requirements. This bill would exempt from the requirements of CEQA a housing development project, as defined, that meets certain conditions relating to, for example, size, density, and location, including specific requirements for any housing on the project site located within 500 feet of a freeway. The bill would require a local government, as a condition of approval for the development, to require the development proponent to complete a specified environmental assessment regarding hazardous substance releases. If a recognized environmental condition is found, the bill would require the development proponent to complete a preliminary endangerment assessment and specified mitigation based on that assessment. Because a lead agency would be required to determine whether a housing development project qualifies for this exemption, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
May 2025
Assembly Passage
May 2025
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 13, 2025
Last action May 20, 2025
Floor votes · Assembly May 19, 2025
How they voted
66–0
Passed · 12 other
Total votes 78
May 19, 2025
D
Democratic59
86% Yea
R
Republican19
78% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
17
Key actions
5
Committee
7
Amendments
5
May 19, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 67. Noes 0. Page 1603.)
lower
May 14, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 14).
lower
May 6, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 5, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
May 1, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (April 30).
lower
Apr 28, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
lower
Apr 24, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 23, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on H. & C.D. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 21).
lower
Apr 21, 2025
Committee
(Pending re-refer to Com. on H. & C. D.)
lower
Mar 25, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Mar 24, 2025
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on NAT. RES. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 24, 2025
Committee
Referred to Coms. on NAT. RES. and H. & C.D.
lower
Feb 14, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.
lower
1 primary · 11 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Buffy Wicks
DDemocratic
Co
Alex Lee
DDemocratic
Co
David Alvarez
DDemocratic
Co
Greg Wallis
RRepublican
Co
Heath Flora
RRepublican
Co
JA
Jesse Arreguín
DDemocratic
Co
John Harabedian
DDemocratic
Co
Joshua Hoover
RRepublican
Co
Juan Carrillo
DDemocratic
Co
Lori Wilson
DDemocratic
Co
Scott Wiener
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 609
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 609. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline