AB 508 California Assembly · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Residential care facilities for the elderly: direct care ratios.

Summary
Existing law, the California Residential Care Facilities for the Elderly Act, requires the State Department of Social Services to license, inspect, and regulate residential care facilities for the elderly (RCFEs) , as defined, and imposes criminal penalties on a person who violates the act or who willfully or repeatedly violates any rule or regulation adopted under the act. This bill would require each RCFE to calculate a direct care ratio, as defined, and maintain records of its direct care ratios for a minimum of 12 months. The bill would require RCFEs to disclose its direct care ratios to residents or to the resident's representatives upon admission and any time there is a rate increase, as specified. The bill would require these disclosures to be provided in writing and signed by the resident, the resident's representative, or the licensee or an employee of the licensee, as specified, to confirm receipt. The bill would require copies of the signed disclosure to be provided to the resident or the resident's representative. The bill would require each RCFE to make its direct care ratios available to the public by specified means, including, among others, by posting the daily direct care ratio on the facility's internet website. The bill would require the RCFE's internet website and any literature or internet website used to advertise the RCFE and the level of care provided by that facility to include a statement that direct care ratios are calculated on a daily basis, that direct care ratios are available to the public upon request for any given day within the prior 12 months, and that direct care ratios are required to be disclosed to residents or their representatives at the points of time described above. The bill would require each RCFE to post the daily direct care ratio in locations visible to all residents, including, but not limited to, the lunchroom or lobby of the facility. By expanding the definition of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status failed 1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 10, 2025 Last action Feb 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons

What changed between versions

04/24/25 - Amended Assembly AB508 · 1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes occurred between these two versions. The diff reflects a reformatting and republishing of the same bill text (AB 508) from a different source or web interface, adding website navigation elements and metadata while preserving identical legislative content.
TECHNICAL

The bill text was republished with a different header format and additional website navigation elements (skip to content, home, accessibility, FAQ, etc.) and metadata such as publication date. The underlying statutory language of Section 1569.375 and Section 2 is unchanged.

Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
10
Key actions
4
Committee
6
Amendments
2
Feb 2, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
lower
May 23, 2025
Lower · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
lower
May 7, 2025
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 28, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 24, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 23, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 22).
lower
Mar 28, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on AGING & L.T.C.
lower
Feb 11, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 13.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Cecilia Aguiar-Curry
Cecilia Aguiar-Curry
DDemocratic
CA
4