Criminal procedure: vacatur relief.
Summary
Existing law allows a person who was arrested or convicted of a nonviolent offense while they were a victim of intimate partner violence, or sexual violence, to petition the court, under penalty of perjury, for vacatur relief. Existing law requires, in order to receive that relief, that the petitioner establish, by clear and convincing evidence, that the arrest or conviction was the direct result of being a victim of intimate partner violence or sexual violence that demonstrates the petitioner lacked the requisite intent. Existing law authorizes the court to vacate the conviction if it makes specified findings. This bill would require the court, before it may vacate the conviction, to make findings regarding the impact on the public health, safety, and welfare, if the petitioner holds a license, as defined, and the offense is substantially related to the qualifications, functions, or duties of a licensee. The bill would require a petitioner who holds a license to serve the petition and supporting documentation on the applicable licensing entity and would give the licensing entity 45 days to respond to the petition for relief.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 10, 2025
Last action Feb 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
02/10/25 - Introduced
→
AB479
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes were made between these two versions. The diff reflects a difference in document format only: the first version is the traditional legislative print format with line numbers and page headers, while the second is a web-scraped version from the California Legislature website that includes site navigation elements. The statutory text of Section 236.15, the legislative counsel's digest, and all substantive provisions are identical.
TECHNICAL
The document was reformatted from a traditional legislative print layout (with line numbers, page headers/footers, and centered formatting) to a web-scraped version from leginfo.legislature.ca.gov that includes website navigation menus, search tools, and metadata fields. No changes to the actual legal text or policy content were made.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
6
Key actions
3
Committee
4
Feb 2, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
lower
Mar 26, 2025
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Feb 24, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 11, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 13.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
David Tangipa
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 479
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 479. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline