County air pollution control districts: Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District: board members: compensation.
Summary
Existing law provides for the creation of a county air pollution control district in every county not included within other specified districts. Existing law requires, under certain circumstances, the membership of the governing board of each county air pollution control district to include one or more members who are mayors, city council members, or both, and one or more members who are county supervisors. This bill would provide that a member of the board is entitled to reimbursement for actual and necessary expenses incurred in the performance of board duties, as specified. The bill would require, upon adoption of a resolution by the county district board, each member of the board to receive compensation, subject to specified daily and annual limits, while attending meetings of the board or any committee of the board or while engaged in the official business of the county district, as specified. The bill would require a county district board that elects to provide compensation to its board to submit a report containing specified information to the relevant committees of the Legislature within 3 years of the commencement of that compensation. The bill would provide that these provisions apply only to a county district board subject to the above-described membership requirement. Existing law establishes the Antelope Valley Air Quality Management District, governed by a 7-member board, and prescribes the powers and duties of the district board with respect to the control of air pollution in the district. This bill would provide that a member of the board is entitled to reimbursement for actual and necessary expenses incurred in the performance of board duties, as specified. The bill would require, upon adoption of a resolution by the district board, each member of the board to receive compensation, subject to specified daily and annual limits, while attending meetings of the board or any committee of the board or while engaged in the official business of the county district, as specified. The bill would require the district board, if it elects to provide compensation to its board, to submit a report containing specified information to the relevant committees of the Legislature within 3 years of the commencement of that compensation. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the boards.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
May 2025
Assembly Passage
Apr 2025
Senate Passage
Sep 2025
Signed into Law
Oct 2025
Introduced Feb 6, 2025
Signed Oct 6, 2025
Maddy AI version diff · 6 comparisons
What changed between versions
10/06/25 - Chaptered
→
AB471
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes occurred between these two versions of AB 471. The difference is entirely presentational: the bill text was reformatted from a formal chaptered document layout (with the 'STATE OF CALIFORNIA AUTHENTICATED ELECTRONIC LEGAL MATERIAL' header) into a web page format with site navigation elements, version history links, and UI components. All statutory provisions remain identical.
TECHNICAL
The document was reformatted from a formal chaptered legislative document into a website layout. Navigation menus (home, FAQ, feedback, sitemap, login), search tools, version history links, and other web UI elements were added. The 'STATE OF CALIFORNIA AUTHENTICATED ELECTRONIC LEGAL MATERIAL' header was removed. No changes to any statutory language, dollar amounts, deadlines, or policy provisions.
Floor votes · Senate Sep 3, 2025 · Assembly Apr 10, 2025
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 40
Sep 3, 2025
D
Democratic30
96% Yea
R
Republican10
40% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
19
Key actions
8
Committee
4
Amendments
7
Oct 6, 2025
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 4, 2025
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 74. Noes 2. Page 2917.).
lower
Sep 3, 2025
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 3, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 33. Noes 0. Page 2458.).
upper
Jul 17, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Jul 16, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (July 16).
upper
Jul 7, 2025
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
Jun 19, 2025
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
Jun 18, 2025
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 18).
upper
May 7, 2025
Committee
Referred to Coms. on E.Q. and L. GOV.
upper
Apr 10, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 66. Noes 2. Page 1114.)
lower
Mar 25, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (March 24).
lower
Feb 24, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Feb 7, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 9.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 471
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 471. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline