Impeding emergency response with drone.
Summary
Existing law makes it a crime for a person to operate or use an unmanned aerial vehicle, remote piloted aircraft, or drone at the scene of an emergency for the purpose of viewing the scene or emergency or military personnel, and thereby impede the emergency or military personnel, in the performance of their duties in coping with the emergency. Existing law excuses a local public entity or public employee from liability for damage to an unmanned aircraft or unmanned aircraft system, if the damage was caused while the local public entity or public employee of a local public entity was providing, and the unmanned aircraft or unmanned aircraft system was interfering with, the operation, support, or enabling of any emergency service, as specified. Existing law imposes liability for physical invasion of privacy on a person if the person knowingly enters onto the land or into the airspace above the land of another person without permission or otherwise commits a trespass in order to capture any image or recording of the other person engaging in a private activity and the invasion occurs in a manner that is offensive to a reasonable person. This bill would prohibit a person from operating or using an unmanned aerial vehicle, remote piloted aircraft, or drone at the scene of an emergency and thereby impeding firefighters, peace officers, medical personnel, military personnel, or other emergency personnel in the performance of their fire suppression, law enforcement, or emergency response duties, unless the person has a federal operational waiver, as specified. The bill would authorize the Attorney General or a county counsel or city attorney to bring civil action to enforce the prohibition and authorize a prevailing plaintiff to recover civil penalties, injunctive relief, or reasonable attorney's fees and costs, as specified.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2025
Committee Review
Aug 2025
Assembly Passage
Jun 2025
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 5, 2025
Last action Aug 29, 2025
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 5, 2025
How they voted
75–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 78
Jun 5, 2025
D
Democratic59
94% Yea
R
Republican19
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
16
Key actions
7
Committee
11
Amendments
1
Aug 29, 2025
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 18, 2025
Committee
In committee: Referred to suspense file.
upper
Jul 9, 2025
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (July 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 18, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Jun 5, 2025
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 2105.)
lower
May 23, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (May 23).
lower
Apr 30, 2025
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file.
lower
Apr 22, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 8, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 7). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 3, 2025
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E.M.
lower
Apr 2, 2025
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on E.M. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 17, 2025
Committee
Referred to Coms. on E.M and JUD.
lower
Feb 6, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 8.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Diane Dixon
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 426
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 426. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline