Interior designers.
Summary
(1) Existing law, until January 1, 2027, provides a comprehensive scheme for the certification and regulation of interior designers. Existing law establishes the California Council for Interior Design Certification (council) , which is a nonprofit organization consisting of certified interior designers, as defined. Under existing law, the council carries out the responsibilities and duties set forth in the aforementioned scheme, including by issuing certifications and stamps certifying specified interior designer standards to qualified individuals. Under existing law, the procedure for stamp issuance is subject to occupational analyses and examination validation every 5 to 7 years. Under existing law, the policy for the validation is developed by the Department of Consumer Affairs. This bill would extend the operation of these provisions until January 1, 2031. The bill would provide that protection of the public shall be the highest priority for the council in exercising its certification and disciplinary authority, and any other functions. The bill would also provide that when the protection of the public is inconsistent with other interests, the protection of the public is paramount. The bill would state that it is the intent of the Legislature in extending the council's powers and duties through the sunset review process that the council continue to serve as an entity entrusted with administering a state function in its certification of interior design professionals. Existing law authorizes the council to issue an interior design certification to any applicant who provides satisfactory evidence that they meet all of specified requirements and who complies with the bylaws, rules, and procedures established by the council, as provided. This bill would require a certified interior designer to report to the council within 30 days of the date the certified interior designer has knowledge of a certain judgment, settlement, or arbitration award of $5,000 or greater against the certified interior designer in an action alleging fraud, deceit, negligence, incompetence, or recklessness by the certified interior designer in the practice of interior design, as specified. The bill would require the certified interior designer to promptly respond to oral or written inquiries from the council concerning the reportable event, as specified, and would make failure of a certified interior designer to comply with these requirements, among other things, grounds for disciplinary action. The bill would also require an insurer providing professional liability insurance to a certified interior designer or a state or local governmental agency that self-insures a certified interior designer to report to the council certain information relating to a payment of a judgment, settlement, or arbitration award described above within 30 days of the payment. The bill would impose the above-described reporting requirements if certain criteria are met, including that a certified interior designer was in responsible control of the portion of the project that was the subject of the civil judgment, settlement, arbitration award, or administrative action. The bill would specify that a certified interior designer is not considered to have violated a confidential settlement agreement or other confidential agreement by providing a report described above. The bill would authorize the council to adopt bylaws, rules, and procedures to further define the reporting requirements. Existing law authorizes the council to take reasonable actions to carry out its responsibilities and duties, as specified. This bill would prohibit the total annual salary for any individual employed or contracted by the council from exceeding the annual salary provided to certain state officers during that fiscal year. Existing law, the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act, requires, with specified exceptions, that all meetings of a state body be open and public and all persons be permitted to attend any meeting of a state body. The act imposes various requirements on a state body holding a meeting subject to the act, including, among other things, requiring the state body to provide notice of its meeting to any person who requests that notice in writing. Existing law requires meetings of the council issuing stamps to be subject to the rules of the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act. This bill would, except as otherwise provided in the provision providing a comprehensive scheme for the certification and regulation of interior designers, require meetings of the council to be governed by either Rosenberg's Rules of Order or Robert's Rules of Order, Newly Revised. The bill would require the council to provide a meaningful opportunity for public participation in the adoption, amendment, or repeal of any policies, procedures, rules, or bylaws that substantially impact the rights, benefits, privileges, duties, obligations, or responsibilities of individuals or entities subject to certification or approval by the council, including, among other things, actions by the council to increase fees. In this regard, the bill would require the council, at a minimum, to publish the complete text of any policies, procedures, rules, or bylaws proposed for adoption, amendment, or repeal along with a summary of the changes being considered for a period of at least 45 calendar days before the adoption, amendment, or repeal, and to accept written public comments during the 45-day period and allow further public comment during a meeting held for these purposes. Existing law, the California Public Records Act, requires state and local agencies to make their records available for public inspection, unless an exemption from disclosure applies. This bill would require the council, beginning July 1, 2028, and to the extent practicable, to make the records of the council available for public inspection in a manner consistent with the California Public Records Act, as specified, and would authorize the council to charge for the direct costs of responding to requests for records, as specified. (2) Existing law governs works of improvement, including design professionals liens. Existing law defines "design professional" for that purpose to include, among other things, a person licensed as an architect, as specified. This bill would also include a person certified as an interior designer pursuant to the provisions described above as a "design professional."
Bill status
passed both
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Aug 2026
Assembly Passage
May 2026
Senate Passage
Aug 2026
Governor
Introduced Feb 23, 2026
Last action Aug 27, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 4 comparisons
What changed between versions
08/17/26 - Amended Senate
→
AB2772
·
2 edits
MINOR
The enrolled version of AB 2772 made two substantive changes to the civil penalty provisions in Section 5808(a)(5). It corrected a drafting error that listed both $1,000 and $5,000 as the maximum penalty, settling on $5,000. It also removed an enhanced penalty of up to $20,000 for knowing and intentional failure to report, leaving only the standard $100 to $5,000 range. All other changes are formatting differences between the legislative document layout and the web display format.
ENFORCEMENT
The maximum civil penalty for failing to comply with reporting requirements was clarified from an ambiguous 'not more than one five thousand dollars ($1,000) ($5,000)' to 'not more than five thousand dollars ($5,000),' resolving a drafting error.
The provision imposing an additional civil penalty of up to $20,000 for a certified interior designer who knowingly and intentionally fails to comply with reporting requirements was removed entirely, leaving only the standard $100 to $5,000 intermediate sanction.
Floor votes · Senate Aug 24, 2026 · Assembly May 27, 2026
How they voted
35–3
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 40
Aug 24, 2026
D
Democratic30
100% Yea
R
Republican10
50% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
11
Committee
9
Amendments
6
Aug 27, 2026
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 66. Noes 1.).
lower
Aug 25, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 14. Noes 1.) (August 25).
lower
Aug 25, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B. & P. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 24, 2026
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 24, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 34. Noes 3.).
upper
Aug 17, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Aug 3, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 30, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 29, 2026
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 2.) (June 29).
upper
Jun 16, 2026
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on B. P. & E.D.
upper
Jun 3, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. P. & E.D.
upper
May 27, 2026
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (77-0-2)
assembly
May 26, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 78. Noes 0.)
lower
May 14, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 14).
lower
May 6, 2026
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 21, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (April 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 16, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & P.
lower
Feb 24, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 26.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Marc Berman
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2772
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2772. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline