Juveniles.
Summary
Existing law subjects a person between 12 and 17 years of age, inclusive, who commits a crime, and a person under 12 years of age who commits specified crimes, to the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, which may adjudge that person to be a ward of the court. Under existing law, as added by the Gang Violence and Juvenile Crime Prevention Act of 1998, approved as Proposition 21 at the March 7, 2000, statewide primary election, a minor may be eligible for deferred entry of judgment if certain circumstances apply, including, among others, that the minor has not previously been declared to be a ward of the court for the commission of a felony offense. Existing law requires, once eligibility is established, the court to determine whether the minor is suitable for deferred entry of judgment and would benefit from education, treatment, and rehabilitation efforts. This bill would require the court to consider whether the minor is charged with an offense of carrying a loaded firearm, as specified, when evaluating suitability of the minor for deferred entry of judgment.
Bill status
passed both
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Aug 2026
Assembly Passage
May 2026
Senate Passage
Aug 2026
Governor
Introduced Feb 20, 2026
Last action Aug 25, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons
What changed between versions
08/21/26 - Enrolled
→
AB2636
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes between these two versions. The difference is entirely presentational: the first version is the formal enrolled bill document with legislative headers, signatures, and page numbers, while the second is a web-based rendering of the same bill text from the California Legislature website, complete with navigation menus and site elements.
TECHNICAL
The bill text was reformatted from a formal enrolled legislative document (with chapter header, signature blocks, and page numbers) into a web page layout with site navigation, search tools, and status tracking elements. The underlying statutory language of Section 790 is identical in both versions.
Floor votes · Senate Aug 19, 2026 · Assembly May 7, 2026
How they voted
33–4
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 40
Aug 19, 2026
D
Democratic30
76% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
6
Committee
7
Amendments
1
Aug 19, 2026
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Aug 19, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 33. Noes 4.).
upper
Jun 9, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 9).
upper
May 20, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 7, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 59. Noes 0. Page 4961.)
lower
Apr 22, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 21).
lower
Mar 17, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 16, 2026
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 16, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 21, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Blanca Pacheco
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2636
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2636. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline