Voter registration information: confidentiality.
What changed between versions
Immediate family members whose information is included in a confidentiality request must now submit a signed statement confirming they want confidential status and that they understand they will lose the ability to vote a nonprovisional ballot in person at the polls (though they can still vote by mail ballot at a polling place or dropoff location). This is a new informed consent requirement not present in the introduced version.
For candidates, the triggering event for confidentiality changed from filing nomination papers (which would automatically trigger a 5-business-day confidentiality process) to actually qualifying to appear on the ballot. A candidate who files but does not qualify for the ballot will no longer have their information made confidential.
The language was changed from 'shall may have' (a drafting error suggesting mandatory confidentiality) to 'may have,' making it clear that confidential status is permissive and requires an affirmative written request rather than being automatically applied.
New provision clarifying that a candidate who is elected automatically retains confidential status until sworn into office, and if they wish to retain it beyond that point, they must apply to the county elections official. They then retain status until opting out or two years after leaving office.
The introduced version's automatic triggering mechanism tied to nomination papers filing (where the Secretary of State would provide a list to counties and counties would make information confidential within 5 business days of receiving that list) was removed. The new version ties the process to ballot qualification instead.
The provision requiring elected officials or candidates holding office as of the effective date to contact their county elections official to ensure their record was made confidential was removed from the amended version.