California Environmental Quality Act: natural hazards and adverse environmental conditions.
Summary
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of an environmental impact report (EIR) on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. CEQA defines "environment" and "significant effect on the environment" for its purposes. CEQA requires the EIR to include a detailed statement setting forth specified facts. This bill would expand those definitions to include impacts on people, as specified. The bill would additionally require the lead agency to include in the EIR a detailed statement on any significant effects that may result from locating the proposed project near, or attracting people to, existing or reasonably foreseeable natural hazards or adverse environmental conditions. Because the lead agency would be required to undertake this additional consideration, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 20, 2026
Last action May 14, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
02/20/26 - Introduced
→
AB2569
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes were made to AB 2569 between these two versions. The bill text, including all four sections amending the Public Resources Code, is identical in both versions. The differences are entirely presentational: the document was reformatted from a traditional printed legislative layout (with line numbers and page headers) to a web-based bill text page with navigation elements.
TECHNICAL
The document was reformatted from a printed legislative document style (with line numbers, page footers, and block indentation) to a web-based presentation with site navigation links, a different header structure, and a 'Digest Key' section. No changes to the actual statutory language.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
6
Key actions
3
Committee
5
May 14, 2026
Lower · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
lower
Apr 29, 2026
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 14, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 4.) (April 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 9, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Feb 21, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Gregg Hart
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2569
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2569. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline