Genetic disease screening.
Summary
Existing law requires the State Department of Public Health to establish a program for the development, provision, and evaluation of genetic disease testing. Existing law establishes the continuously appropriated Genetic Disease Testing Fund (GDTF) , consisting of fees paid for newborn screening tests, and states the intent of the Legislature that all costs of the genetic disease testing program be fully supported by fees paid for newborn screening tests, which are deposited in the GDTF. Existing law also authorizes moneys in the GDTF to be used for the expansion of the Genetic Disease Branch Screening Information System to include cystic fibrosis, biotinidase, severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID) , adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD) , and any other disease that is detectable in blood samples, as specified, and exempts the expansion of contracts for this purpose from certain provisions of the Public Contract Code, the Government Code, and the State Administrative Manual, as specified. This bill would require the department to expand statewide screening of newborns to include screening for Duchenne muscular dystrophy as soon as possible, but no later than January 1, 2027. By expanding the purposes for which moneys from the GDTF may be expended, this bill would make an appropriation.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2025
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Jan 14, 2025
Last action Feb 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
01/14/25 - Introduced
→
AB242
·
1 edit
MINOR
The changes between these two versions of AB 242 are primarily formatting and presentation differences. The bill text was reformatted from a traditional legislative document layout (with line numbers, page headers, and column formatting) to a web-based display format (with navigation menus, search elements, and different typographic structure). No substantive policy content was added, removed, or modified.
TECHNICAL
The bill text was reformatted from a printed legislative document style (with line numbers like 'line 1', page headers, and dual-column layout) to a web page presentation with navigation elements, search bars, and simplified formatting. The underlying policy language is identical in both versions.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
9
Key actions
5
Committee
7
Feb 2, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Filed with the Chief Clerk pursuant to Joint Rule 56.
lower
May 23, 2025
Lower · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
lower
Apr 23, 2025
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file.
lower
Apr 2, 2025
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (April 1). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 20, 2025
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Feb 10, 2025
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Jan 15, 2025
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 14.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Tasha Boerner
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 242
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 242. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline