State agencies: governmental linguistics.
Summary
Existing law requires each department, commission, office, or other administrative agency of state government to write each document, as defined, that it produces in plain, straightforward language, avoiding technical terms as much as possible, and using a coherent and easily readable style. This bill would instead require each state agency, as described above, to write each document it produces after January 1, 2027, either digitally or in print, in plain language, as specified, and would define "plain language" for purposes of that provision. The bill would authorize a state agency, as described above, to use standards created by the Office of Data and Innovation that identify how a state agency incorporates plain language principles and practices. The bill would require the head of each state agency to, among other things, designate one or more senior officials within the state agency to oversee state agency implementation of these provisions.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Aug 2026
Assembly Passage
May 2026
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2026
Last action Aug 13, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
05/18/26 - Amended Assembly
→
AB2360
·
2 edits
MINOR
This diff represents a change in document format rather than substantive policy. The 'from' version is a formatted legislative document (Amended Assembly, May 18, 2026) and the 'to' version is a web page rendering of the same bill text. The underlying policy content of AB 2360 remains unchanged between the two versions.
TECHNICAL
The document was reformatted from a clean legislative text layout to a web page that includes navigation menus, metadata headers, and inline amendment markup showing old versus new language side by side.
Web page elements were added including navigation links (home, accessibility, FAQ, feedback, sitemap, login), search tools, bill tracking features, and version history display.
Floor votes · Assembly May 27, 2026
How they voted
76–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 79
May 27, 2026
D
Democratic59
96% Yea
R
Republican20
95% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Amendments
2
Aug 13, 2026
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 3, 2026
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 23, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (June 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 10, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
May 27, 2026
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (76-0-3)
assembly
May 26, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0.)
lower
May 18, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
May 14, 2026
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (May 14).
lower
Apr 22, 2026
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 9, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 22. Noes 0.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 9, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
Feb 20, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Joaquin Arambula
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2360
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2360. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline