Mental health diversion.
What changed between versions
The written diagnosis of a mental disorder required for diversion eligibility must now be from within the preceding 2 years instead of 5 years.
A new eligibility requirement prohibits the court from finding a defendant eligible for diversion if the defendant is mentally incompetent as described in Section 1367.
Theft or attempted theft offenses carried out in a manner indicating planning, sophistication, or professionalism are now absolutely excluded from diversion.
Unless both parties stipulate to placement, defendants charged with a violent felony (as defined in Section 667.5(c)) or a felony domestic violence offense involving a victim described in Family Code Section 6211 cannot be placed in diversion.
The court's suitability factors were restructured: the court SHALL now consider the district attorney's opinion, defense opinion, treatment plan, violence and criminal history, and current charged offense. It MAY (rather than shall) consider a qualified mental health expert's opinion, the victim's opinion, and other factors.
Courts must order restitution to victims when a defendant participates in a diversion program, extending the existing restitution mandate beyond convictions to include diversion dismissals.
The court's duty to consider suitability was changed from 'must' to 'shall,' and language in the consent/treatment compliance provisions was revised to clarify that defendants found incompetent may still be placed in diversion in lieu of commitment without their personal consent.