AB 2275 California Assembly · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Mental health diversion.

Summary
Existing law authorizes the court to grant pretrial diversion to a defendant diagnosed with a mental disorder if the defendant satisfies certain eligibility requirements and if the court determines that the defendant is suitable for diversion. Existing law provides that a defendant is eligible for diversion if they have been diagnosed with certain mental disorders and the court finds that the mental disorder was a significant factor in the commission of the charged offense, unless there is clear and convincing evidence that the disorder was not a motivating, causal, or contributing factor to the defendant's involvement in the alleged offense. Existing law excludes a defendant from diversion for specified charged offenses, including, among others, murder, voluntary manslaughter, rape, or continuous sexual abuse of a child, as specified. Existing law prohibits a person from being tried or adjudged to punishment while that person is mentally incompetent, establishes a process by which a defendant's mental competency is evaluated, and requires a court, before ordering a defendant to be committed to the State Department of State Hospitals or other treatment facility, to hear and determine whether the defendant lacks the capacity to make decisions regarding the administration of antipsychotic medication, as specified. This bill would revise the eligibility requirement by prohibiting the court from finding the defendant eligible solely based on the defendant's diagnosis of a mental disorder and would additionally require the court to find that the defendant is not mentally incompetent. The bill would require the defendant, in order to be eligible, to provide a written diagnosis of a mental disorder, from within the preceding 2 years, to the court and the prosecution, as specified. The bill would additionally exclude a defendant from diversion if they were charged with theft or an attempted theft offense, if the crime was carried out in a manner demonstrating planning, sophistication, or professionalism. The bill would also, unless the parties stipulate to defendant's placement in diversion, prohibit placement if the defendant has been charged with a violent felony, as specified, or certain felony offenses involving domestic violence. The bill would remove the court's authority to grant diversion or other forms of treatment when a defendant is mentally incompetent. Existing law prohibits a person subject to specified protective orders from owning a firearm or ammunition. Existing law requires a person subject to those orders to relinquish any firearms or ammunition they own. This bill would authorize the court, for a defendant charged with a crime involving domestic violence that has completed mental health diversion, to issue an order, for up to 10 years, restraining the defendant from contact with the victim, as specified. The bill would additionally require an individual subject to a protective order through the above-described provisions to relinquish their firearms or ammunition. The California Constitution entitles the victim of a crime to restitution. Existing law requires the court in each criminal case to order a convicted defendant to pay full restitution to the victim and a separate restitution fine, as specified. This bill would require that the court order restitution to the victim or victims if a defendant participates in a diversion program. This bill would make other conforming changes.
Bill status in committee 1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2026 Last action Mar 9, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison

What changed between versions

02/19/26 - Introduced AB2275 · 7 edits
MODERATE
AB 2275 tightens mental health pretrial diversion eligibility and adds new exclusions. The diagnosis window was shortened from 5 years to 2 years, a new requirement bars mentally incompetent defendants, and theft offenses showing planning or sophistication are now excluded. Additionally, violent felonies and felony domestic violence offenses are barred from diversion unless both parties stipulate, and courts must now order restitution to victims even when a defendant participates in diversion.
ELIGIBILITY

The written diagnosis of a mental disorder required for diversion eligibility must now be from within the preceding 2 years instead of 5 years.

A new eligibility requirement prohibits the court from finding a defendant eligible for diversion if the defendant is mentally incompetent as described in Section 1367.

SCOPE

Theft or attempted theft offenses carried out in a manner indicating planning, sophistication, or professionalism are now absolutely excluded from diversion.

Unless both parties stipulate to placement, defendants charged with a violent felony (as defined in Section 667.5(c)) or a felony domestic violence offense involving a victim described in Family Code Section 6211 cannot be placed in diversion.

REQUIREMENT

The court's suitability factors were restructured: the court SHALL now consider the district attorney's opinion, defense opinion, treatment plan, violence and criminal history, and current charged offense. It MAY (rather than shall) consider a qualified mental health expert's opinion, the victim's opinion, and other factors.

Courts must order restitution to victims when a defendant participates in a diversion program, extending the existing restitution mandate beyond convictions to include diversion dismissals.

ENFORCEMENT

The court's duty to consider suitability was changed from 'must' to 'shall,' and language in the consent/treatment compliance provisions was revised to clarify that defendants found incompetent may still be placed in diversion in lieu of commitment without their personal consent.

Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
3
Key actions
1
Committee
2
Mar 9, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 20, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Jasmeet Bains
Jasmeet Bains
DDemocratic
CA
35