Courts: disqualification of judges.
Summary
Existing law establishes procedures for a judge to disqualify themselves from a case. Under existing law, if a judge who should disqualify themselves refuses or fails to do so, a party may file with the clerk a written verified statement objecting to the hearing or trial before the judge and setting forth the facts constituting grounds for disqualification of the judge. Existing law requires copies of the statement to be served on each party and personally served on the judge alleged to be disqualified or on their clerk, provided that the judge is present in the courthouse or in chambers. This bill would require the statement to be served during regular business hours on the judge alleged to be disqualified at the courthouse in which the judge is sitting. The bill would, in addition to the clerk, permit service of the statement on the designee of the clerk of the court, provided that the judge is present in the courthouse or in chambers.
Bill status
passed both
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Jun 2026
Assembly Passage
May 2026
Senate Passage
Aug 2026
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2026
Last action Aug 28, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 4 comparisons
What changed between versions
08/26/26 - Enrolled
→
AB2262
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes were made. The diff reflects a transition from a formal enrolled legislative document format to a web page rendering of the same bill on the California legislature website. The actual legal text amending Section 170.3 of the Code of Civil Procedure is identical in both versions.
TECHNICAL
The document was reformatted from a formal enrolled bill layout (with chapter designation, clerk signatures, and approval block) to a web page presentation including navigation menus, search tools, version history, and status information. The underlying legal text is unchanged.
Floor votes · Senate Aug 20, 2026 · Assembly May 4, 2026
How they voted
38–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 40
Aug 20, 2026
D
Democratic30
93% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Amendments
4
Aug 24, 2026
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0.).
lower
Aug 20, 2026
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 20, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 38. Noes 0.).
upper
Aug 12, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Jun 17, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 16).
upper
May 13, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 4, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 2262.)
lower
Apr 28, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (April 28).
lower
Apr 6, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Mar 25, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 24, 2026
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 9, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 20, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2262
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2262. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline