Parole advancement hearings: reporting.
What changed between versions
Removed subdivision (d) of Section 3041.5, which had given inmates the right to submit a written request asking the Board of Parole Hearings to advance their next parole hearing date based on changed circumstances or new information. This included the board's sole jurisdiction over such requests and a limit of one request per three-year period.
Added new Section 3069.6 to the Penal Code requiring the Board of Parole Hearings, in coordination with the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, to collect and publish annual data on parole hearing advancement requests and decisions. The report must be submitted to the Legislature by March 1, 2027, and annually thereafter, and made publicly available on the board's website.
The new reporting requirement specifies detailed data categories including: total volume and outcomes of advancement requests; average denial period duration; timing of grants within a denial period; frequency of repeat requests; criteria and factors relied upon (rehabilitation evidence, institutional behavior, psychological evaluations, offense severity); rehabilitation programming metrics (types considered, completion rates, correlation with decisions, wait times for program admission); victim notification and input data; and outcomes comparing advanced hearings to regularly scheduled hearings including grant rates and recidivism data.
Added a requirement that the board maintain a written summary of each advancement decision, including the basis for approval or denial and primary factors considered. These summaries must be made available to the incarcerated person or their counsel, the victim or next of kin upon request, and the district attorney's office.
The new Section 3069.6 includes a sunset provision repealing the section as of January 1, 2032, making the reporting requirement temporary rather than permanent.
Removed references to subdivision (d) of Section 3041.5 from the Elderly Parole Program (Section 3055), since that subdivision no longer exists after the amendment. Also made gender-neutral language changes throughout, replacing 'his or her' with 'their' and similar updates.