County recorders: fees.
Summary
Existing law establishes the office of county recorder and requires the county recorder to accept for recordation any instrument, paper, or notice that is authorized or required to be recorded, subject to the collection of specified fees. This bill would require the county recorder to provide access to a true copy of the public record for each recorded instrument, paper, or notice, as specified. By imposing new duties on county recorders, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Existing law prohibits the fee for recording and indexing an instrument, paper, or notice from exceeding $10 for recording the first page and $3 for each additional page, which charges are to reimburse the county for the costs of services rendered. Existing law requires the county recorder to impose additional recording fees of $1 per page for nonconforming print spacing and $3 per page for nonconforming page dimensions. Existing law requires $1 of each $3 fee for each additional page to be deposited in the county general fund. The bill would, instead, set the fee for recording and indexing at $15 for recording the first page and $4 for each additional page, and would prohibit the fees from exceeding the reasonable costs of the county recorder's office for providing these services. The bill would delete the provisions requiring $1 and $3 fees for nonconforming spacing and page dimensions, and $1 of each $3 fee for each additional page to be deposited in the county general fund. The bill would require the county recorder collecting a prescribed fee to implement an electronic recording delivery system, and would provide that various other fees are restricted, as prescribed, or solely for the county recorder's office, as specified. Existing law authorizes a county recorder to charge an additional fee of $1 for specified documents requiring additional indexing based on the number of names listed and for each reference to a previously recorded document, other than the first such reference, as specified. The bill would repeal these provisions and make conforming changes. Existing law requires the fee for recording every release of lien, encumbrance, or notice executed by the state, or any municipality, county, city, district, or other political subdivision, to be a certain amount on January 1 of the year the release is recorded if the original lien, encumbrance, or notice was recorded without fee, as specified. This bill would, instead, calculate that fee as of January 1 of the year the original lien, encumbrance, or notice was recorded without fee, as specified. Upon approval by resolution of the board of supervisors and system certification by the Attorney General, existing law authorizes a county recorder to establish an electronic recording delivery system, as specified. Upon system certification, existing law authorizes a county recorder to enter into a contract with any of specified entities for the delivery for recording, and return to the party requesting recording, a digitized electronic record, as specified. Until January 1, 2027, existing law authorizes a county recorder to enter into a contract with an entity other than those specified, as described above, if certain requirements are met. This bill would remove the repeal date of January 1, 2027, and make various conforming changes. Existing law authorizes a county recorder to include in the county's electronic delivery system a secure method for accepting for recording a digital or digitized electronic record that is an instrument of reconveyance, substitution of trustee, or assignment of deed of trust. This bill would remove the limit of the above provisions to those types of documents. The bill would include related legislative findings concerning county recorders and county recorder fees. By imposing new duties on counties relative to recording fees, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed both
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Aug 2026
Assembly Passage
May 2026
Senate Passage
Aug 2026
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2026
Last action Aug 24, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 5 comparisons
What changed between versions
08/19/26 - Enrolled
→
AB2224
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes occurred. The diff reflects a reformatting of AB 2224 from its formal enrolled legislative document layout (with page numbers, chapter headings, and official signatures) to a web page rendering from the California Legislature website. The underlying bill text, fee amounts, deadlines, and statutory amendments are identical in both versions.
TECHNICAL
The document was converted from a formal enrolled bill format (with page numbers, 'CHAPTER' heading, signature blocks, and official formatting) to a web page capture that includes navigation menus, search boxes, version history links, and site chrome elements. The actual legislative content is unchanged.
Floor votes · Senate Aug 17, 2026 · Assembly May 27, 2026
How they voted
38–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 40
Aug 17, 2026
D
Democratic30
100% Yea
R
Republican10
80% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
19
Key actions
10
Committee
9
Amendments
3
Aug 17, 2026
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Aug 17, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 38. Noes 0.).
upper
Jun 29, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 17, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 17). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 10, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
May 27, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 72. Noes 0.)
lower
May 21, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 5242.)
lower
May 7, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 4974.)
lower
May 6, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (May 6).
lower
Apr 23, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 7, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Apr 6, 2026
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 9, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Feb 20, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2224
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2224. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline