Developmental services: caregiver succession.
Summary
Existing law, the Lanterman Developmental Disabilities Services Act, requires the State Department of Developmental Services to contract with regional centers to provide services and supports to individuals with developmental disabilities and their families. Under existing law, the regional centers purchase needed services and supports for individuals with developmental disabilities through approved service providers, or arrange for their provision through other publicly funded agencies. The services and supports to be provided to a regional center consumer are contained in an individual program plan (IPP) , which is developed by the planning team according to specified procedures. Existing law requires the planning process for the IPP to include various components and guidelines, including, when a regional center consumer is being cared for by a parent, a discussion regarding caregiver succession no later than the consumer's 22nd birthday, and annually thereafter, and if determined to be necessary, development of a caregiver succession plan, as specified. This bill would additionally require a discussion regarding caregiver succession to occur when the primary caregiver or authorized representatives reaches 55 years of age, and at any time upon the request of the consumer, primary caregiver, or authorized representative. The bill would require that any caregiver succession plan be documented in the consumer's IPP. The bill would explicitly state that a consumer retains the right to decline development of a caregiver succession plan and a discussion regarding caregiver succession or a caregiver succession plan is required to be person centered and reflect the consumer's wishes, goals, and maximum independence, and be consistent with supported decisionmaking principles, to the extent applicable.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 19, 2026
Last action Apr 14, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
02/19/26 - Introduced
→
AB2209
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes were made between these two versions of AB 2209. The diff reflects a reformatting of the same introduced bill text from a traditional legislative document layout (with line numbers and page headers) into a web page format with navigation elements, search boxes, and different typographic styling. The actual legal provisions are identical in both versions.
TECHNICAL
The bill text was reformatted from a printed document layout with line numbers and page headers into a web page rendering with site navigation, search fields, and metadata elements. No changes to the substantive legal language of Section 4646.5 were made.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
4
Key actions
2
Committee
3
Apr 14, 2026
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 9, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Feb 20, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jasmeet Bains
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2209
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2209. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline