School district employees: merit system.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires vacancies in the classified service of a school district that has adopted the merit system to be filled by appointments made from eligible applicants having the first 3 ranks on the applicable eligibility list who are ready and willing to accept the position. Notwithstanding that provision, existing law authorizes, until January 1, 2027, the Los Angeles Unified School District to make an appointment to one of specified classifications of positions, including, among others, an information technology electronic communications technician, to be made from other than the first 3 ranks on the eligibility list if one or more of specified criteria are required for successful job performance of the position filled, in which case existing law requires the appointment to be made from among the highest 3 ranks of eligible candidates on the list who meet the special requirements and are ready and willing to accept the position. Under existing law, any person who willfully or through culpable negligence violates certain provisions that apply to school district merit systems is guilty of a misdemeanor. This bill would, for purposes of the above-described provision, remove the classification of information technology electronic communications technician from the list of specified classifications and would extend until January 1, 2031, the Los Angeles Unified School District's authority to make an appointment from other than the first 3 ranks on the eligibility list. By extending the operation of a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would require the Los Angeles Unified School District, on or before January 1, 2030, to submit a report to the Legislature on the use of an exemption to the merit process as authorized by the above-described provisions, as provided. (2) Existing law requires that when classified employees are subject to layoff for lack of work or lack of funds, the order of layoff within the class be determined by length of service, providing that the employee who has been employed the shortest time in the class, plus higher classes, be laid off first. Existing law requires that reemployment be in order of seniority. This bill would, notwithstanding the above-described provisions, authorize the Los Angeles Unified School District to retain a classified employee hired pursuant to specified provisions, without regard to seniority, if the employee's layoff would deprive the district of certain specified qualifications that was the basis for the employee's original employment. (3) This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Los Angeles Unified School District. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. (4) This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed both
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Aug 2026
Assembly Passage
May 2026
Senate Passage
Aug 2026
Governor
Introduced Feb 18, 2026
Last action Aug 20, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 4 comparisons
What changed between versions
08/17/26 - Enrolled
→
AB2120
·
1 edit
MINOR
This diff reflects a change in presentation format only, not a substantive policy change. The bill text moved from a formal enrolled document layout (with chapter number, clerk signatures, and page headers) to a web page display format with navigation elements and metadata. The actual statutory content of AB 2120 is identical in both versions.
TECHNICAL
The bill was reformatted from the official enrolled document layout (with chapter number, clerk/governor signature blocks, and page numbering) to a web-based display format with navigation menus, search tools, and version history. No changes were made to the substantive statutory text of Sections 1 through 4.
Floor votes · Senate Aug 10, 2026 · Assembly May 14, 2026
How they voted
39–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 40
Aug 10, 2026
D
Democratic30
100% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
10
Committee
8
Amendments
5
Aug 13, 2026
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 74. Noes 0.).
lower
Aug 11, 2026
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 10, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0.).
upper
Aug 3, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to Consent Calendar.
upper
Jul 2, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (July 1). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 22, 2026
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Jun 11, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Jun 10, 2026
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on ED. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 10).
upper
May 27, 2026
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L., P.E. & R. and ED.
upper
May 14, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 5047.)
lower
May 6, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (May 6).
lower
Apr 23, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 22). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 8, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on ED. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Mar 9, 2026
Committee
Referred to Coms. on P. E. & R. and ED.
lower
Feb 19, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
JS
José Solache
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2120
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2120. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline