California bar examination.
Summary
The State Bar Act provides for the licensure and regulation of attorneys by the State Bar of California, a public corporation governed by a board of trustees. Existing law authorizes the board of trustees to establish an examining committee, also known as the Committee of Bar Examiners, and requires an applicant for a license to practice law to pass the general bar examination, known as the California bar examination, given by the examining committee. Existing law prohibits the examining committee from altering the bar examination in a manner that requires the substantial modification of the training or preparation required for passage of the examination, except after giving 2 years' notice of that change. Existing law requires the Committee of Bar Examiners, on or before November 30, 2026, to provide a report to the board of trustees, the Chief Justice of the California Supreme Court, and to the Assembly and Senate Committees on Judiciary on whether adopting a uniform bar examination would be more efficient to administer and lower the cost of administration for the State Bar and examinees. This bill would require the examining committee, on January 1, 2029, to replace the California bar examination with the National Conference of Bar Examiners' Uniform Bar Examination or any successor or replacement of that exam.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Jun 2026
Assembly Passage
May 2026
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 18, 2026
Last action Jun 10, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
03/17/26 - Amended Assembly
→
AB2109
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes were made between these two versions. The bill text, digest, and all operative provisions are identical. The differences are entirely in formatting and presentation: the second version reformats the document for web display, adding navigation elements and removing line numbers.
TECHNICAL
The document was reformatted from a plain-text legislative print layout (with line numbers and page headers) to a web-based display format with navigation menus, quick search fields, and restructured headings. No changes to the bill's operative language, dates, or requirements.
Floor votes · Assembly May 27, 2026
How they voted
72–0
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 79
May 27, 2026
D
Democratic59
91% Yea
R
Republican20
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
10
Key actions
3
Committee
5
Amendments
1
Jun 10, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 27, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 0.)
lower
Mar 24, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (March 24).
lower
Mar 18, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 17, 2026
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on JUD. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 2, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 19, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Diane Dixon
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2109
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2109. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline