Workers' compensation: medical treatment.
What changed between versions
All provisions amending Section 21008 of the Government Code (Public Employees' Retirement Law) regarding service credit for time excused from duties are removed. The bill no longer touches PERS.
The bill title and legislative counsel's digest are updated to remove all reference to public employees' retirement, now describing the act solely as amending Section 4600 of, adding Section 4600.03 to, and amending Section 132a of the Labor Code.
A new Labor Code section 4600.03 is created as a standalone provision governing scheduling of workers' compensation medical treatment, notice requirements, employer leave obligations, and concurrency with FMLA/CFRA. Previously these rules were embedded within Section 4600(a)(2).
Section 4600.03(c)(2) creates a new misdemeanor for an employer who denies a treatment leave request and knows or should know that business necessity does not require different timing. This is a direct criminal penalty for the denial itself, separate from any retaliation.
A new paragraph (5) is added to Section 132a(a) of the Labor Code making it a misdemeanor for an employer to discharge, threaten to discharge, or discriminate against an employee because the employee requested or took leave under the new Section 4600.03. This provides anti-retaliation protection with reinstatement and lost wages remedies.
The definition of 'business necessity' changes from a reference to the Barns v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd. (1989) case law to a new statutory definition in Section 4600.03(e): an overriding legitimate business purpose such that denial is necessary for safe and efficient operation, with no feasible alternative.
Fiscal committee review changes from 'no' to 'yes' and state-mandated local program changes from 'no' to 'yes,' reflecting that the bill now creates new crimes (the treatment denial misdemeanor and the anti-retaliation misdemeanor) rather than only expanding an existing one.