Child protection: safe surrender.
Summary
Existing law defines a safe-surrender site to mean a location designated by the board of supervisors of a county or by a local fire agency, or a location within a public or private hospital that is designated by that hospital, to be responsible for accepting physical custody of a minor child who is 72 hours old or younger from a parent or individual who has lawful custody of that child and who surrenders the child. Existing law requires personnel on duty at a safe-surrender site to accept physical custody of the minor child, and to notify child protective services or a county agency providing child welfare services as soon as possible, but no later than 48 hours of accepting custody of the child. Existing law makes a violation of these provisions a crime. This bill would authorize, but not require, a safe-surrender site to install an infant safety device, as defined. The bill would require that an infant safety device be climate controlled, equipped with a dual alarm system, as described, and provide for a process or mechanism that maintains the anonymity of an individual who is surrendering a minor child. The bill would require a safe-surrender site that does install an infant safety device to visually check the device and test the above-described alarm system at specified intervals. Because a violation of the provisions relating to safe-surrender sites is a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. Under existing law, a parent or other individual with lawful custody of a minor child 72 hours old or younger who voluntarily surrenders physical custody of the child to personnel on duty at a safe-surrender site cannot be prosecuted for child abandonment. This bill would additionally prevent a parent or other above-described individual from being prosecuted for child abandonment if the parent or individual voluntarily places the minor child in an infant safety device at a safe-surrender site. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 18, 2026
Last action Apr 14, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
02/18/26 - Introduced
→
AB2073
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes occurred between these two versions. The diff reflects a reformatting of the same introduced bill text from the official legislative document layout (with line numbers and page headers) into a website display format. All provisions, definitions, and requirements remain identical.
TECHNICAL
The bill text was reformatted from the official legislative document style (with line numbers, page breaks, and column layout) into a clean web page format. No policy language was added, removed, or altered.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
6
Key actions
4
Committee
5
Apr 14, 2026
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, final hearing. Testimony taken.
lower
Apr 7, 2026
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 24, 2026
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 9, 2026
Committee
Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and JUD.
lower
Feb 19, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 21.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Natasha Johnson
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2073
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2073. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline