California Equal Shared Parenting Act.
Summary
Existing law provides that it is the public policy of this state to ensure that children have frequent and continuing contact with both parents after the parents have ended their relationship, and to encourage parents to share the rights and responsibilities of child rearing in order to effect this policy, except where the contact would not be in the best interest of the child, as specified. Existing law provides for proceedings to determine the custody of a child, and establishes a presumption, affecting the burden of proof, that joint custody is in the best interest of a minor child, as specified. This bill would, for child custody proceedings filed on or after January 1, 2027, establish a rebuttable presumption that equal parenting time is in the best interest of the child if (1) both parents are found fit, willing, and able to parent and (2) both parents reside within 25 miles of the child's primary school or educational institution. The bill would authorize the court to deny equal parenting time if it finds by clear and convincing evidence that shared parenting time is not in the interest of the child due to circumstances that are detrimental to the child, including, but not limited to, a history of substantiated domestic abuse. The bill would require any decision to deny equal parenting time to be substantiated in writing and specify the evidence relied upon.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 13, 2026
Last action Mar 2, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
02/13/26 - Introduced
→
AB1978
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes were made between these two versions. The diff reflects a change in document formatting only: the original version uses a traditional legislative document layout with line numbers, while the new version is the web page rendering of the same bill text from the California legislature website, including navigation elements and site chrome.
TECHNICAL
The bill text was reformatted from a plain legislative document with line numbers into a web page layout that includes site navigation (home, accessibility, FAQ, search, etc.) and standard webpage elements. The actual statutory language, section numbering, and all policy provisions remain identical.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
3
Key actions
1
Committee
2
Mar 2, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 14, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Natasha Johnson
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1978
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1978. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline