Electrical corporations: distribution grid utilization metric.
What changed between versions
The entire amendment to Section 762.5 of the Public Utilities Code was removed. That provision would have required the commission to consider 'anticipated maintenance costs' as a factor when making orders about the location of utility structures, in addition to existing factors like community values and environmental impact.
Legislative findings were softened with more hedging language. For example, 'directly impacts energy affordability' became 'can directly impact energy affordability,' 'distribution system expansion can be avoided' became 'may be avoided,' and 'reduces the average cost of the distribution rate, reducing electricity rates' became 'can reduce the average cost of the distribution services, which may help lower electricity rates.'
The term 'grid utilization metric' was changed throughout to 'distribution grid utilization metric,' narrowing the focus specifically to distribution grids rather than the broader electrical grid.
A specific formula for the metric was added: average electricity delivered over a distribution segment over a period of time divided by that segment's maximum electrical capacity, expressed as a percentage. The commission is given discretion to determine both the geographic scope of each distribution segment and the time period used.
The requirement that the commission 'annually establish a minimum value' that 'shall increase annually' was replaced with a requirement to 'establish and periodically update, as appropriate, a distribution grid utilization standard.' This removes the mandatory annual increase and gives the commission more flexibility in timing.
Quarterly reporting requirements were expanded. The commission now determines the manner, frequency, and geographic scope of reports. Reports must now include: the distribution grid utilization metric for each distribution segment, data on performance of programs intended to increase utilization, and data sufficient to identify opportunities to improve utilization and reduce distribution system costs.
The commission's obligation to 'establish financial performance-based incentives or disincentives' was changed to permissive language: the commission 'may direct each large electrical corporation to implement programs, rate designs, or other incentives, or may establish financial performance-based incentives or disincentives.' A new condition was added requiring that before any performance-based incentive can be established, a methodology must have been developed, utility performance must have been measured over a reasonable period, and the commission must be able to evaluate the impact of utility actions on utilization.