AB 1975 California Assembly · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Electrical corporations: distribution grid utilization metric.

Summary
Existing law vests the Public Utilities Commission with regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations. Existing law authorizes the commission to fix the rates and charges for every public utility and requires that those rates and charges be just and reasonable. This bill would require the commission, on or before December 31, 2027, to develop a methodology for calculating a distribution grid utilization metric, as specified. The bill would require each large electrical corporation, in a manner, frequency, and geographic scope determined by the commission, to submit a publicly available report to the commission with the results of the large electrical corporation's distribution grid utilization metric calculations, as specified. The bill would require the commission to establish and periodically update, as appropriate, a distribution grid utilization standard for each large electrical corporation and to ensure the distribution grid utilization standard encourages, and does not inhibit, electrification. The bill would authorize the commission to direct each large electrical corporation to implement programs, rate designs, or other incentives, or to establish financial performance-based incentives or disincentives correlated with achieving the distribution grid utilization standard, as specified. Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or any order, decision, rule, direction, demand, or requirement of the commission is a crime. Because the above-described provisions would be part of the act and a violation of a commission action implementing the bill's requirements would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status in committee 1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 13, 2026 Last action May 14, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons

What changed between versions

03/03/26 - Amended Assembly 04/27/26 - Amended Assembly · 7 edits · Apr 27, 2026
MODERATE
The April 27 amendment to AB 1975 significantly narrows and softens the bill in several ways. It removes an entirely separate provision that would have required the Public Utilities Commission to consider anticipated maintenance costs when ordering the location of utility structures (Section 762.5). For the core grid utilization metric, it replaces mandatory annual minimum values with a more flexible 'standard' that the commission updates periodically as appropriate, changes the incentive mechanism from a requirement to an option, and adds conditions that must be met before performance-based incentives can be established.
Scope change
The bill's scope was reduced by removing the Section 762.5 amendment (utility structure location factors). Within the remaining grid utilization provisions, the commission was given substantially more discretion: the metric formula now includes a specific calculation but with commission-determined parameters, the minimum value requirement became a flexible standard, and the incentive mechanism changed from mandatory to permissive with additional preconditions.
SCOPE

The entire amendment to Section 762.5 of the Public Utilities Code was removed. That provision would have required the commission to consider 'anticipated maintenance costs' as a factor when making orders about the location of utility structures, in addition to existing factors like community values and environmental impact.

Legislative findings were softened with more hedging language. For example, 'directly impacts energy affordability' became 'can directly impact energy affordability,' 'distribution system expansion can be avoided' became 'may be avoided,' and 'reduces the average cost of the distribution rate, reducing electricity rates' became 'can reduce the average cost of the distribution services, which may help lower electricity rates.'

DEFINITION

The term 'grid utilization metric' was changed throughout to 'distribution grid utilization metric,' narrowing the focus specifically to distribution grids rather than the broader electrical grid.

REQUIREMENT

A specific formula for the metric was added: average electricity delivered over a distribution segment over a period of time divided by that segment's maximum electrical capacity, expressed as a percentage. The commission is given discretion to determine both the geographic scope of each distribution segment and the time period used.

The requirement that the commission 'annually establish a minimum value' that 'shall increase annually' was replaced with a requirement to 'establish and periodically update, as appropriate, a distribution grid utilization standard.' This removes the mandatory annual increase and gives the commission more flexibility in timing.

Quarterly reporting requirements were expanded. The commission now determines the manner, frequency, and geographic scope of reports. Reports must now include: the distribution grid utilization metric for each distribution segment, data on performance of programs intended to increase utilization, and data sufficient to identify opportunities to improve utilization and reduce distribution system costs.

ENFORCEMENT

The commission's obligation to 'establish financial performance-based incentives or disincentives' was changed to permissive language: the commission 'may direct each large electrical corporation to implement programs, rate designs, or other incentives, or may establish financial performance-based incentives or disincentives.' A new condition was added requiring that before any performance-based incentive can be established, a methodology must have been developed, utility performance must have been measured over a reasonable period, and the commission must be able to evaluate the impact of utility actions on utilization.

Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
11
Key actions
3
Committee
6
Amendments
3
May 14, 2026
Lower · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
lower
May 13, 2026
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 28, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 27, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 23, 2026
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 22).
lower
Mar 4, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on U. & E.
lower
Mar 3, 2026
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on U. & E. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 2, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on U. & E.
lower
Feb 14, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Nick Schultz
Nick Schultz
DDemocratic
CA
44