Cannabis: testing: quality assurance.
Summary
Existing law, the Control, Regulate and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act (AUMA) , an initiative measure, authorizes a person who obtains a state license under AUMA and any applicable local ordinances to engage in commercial adult-use cannabis activity pursuant to that license, if conducted as prescribed. Existing law, the Medicinal and Adult-Use Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act (MAUCRSA) , among other things, consolidates the licensure and regulation of commercial medicinal and adult-use cannabis activities, and requires the Department of Cannabis Control to administer its provisions. Existing law prohibits cannabis or cannabis products from being sold by a licensee unless specified quality assurance standards and testing standards are met. Existing law requires representative samples of the cannabis or cannabis products in their final form to be tested by a licensed testing laboratory, and requires the department to develop criteria to determine which batches are tested. Existing law authorizes the testing laboratory to retest a sample if the testing laboratory notifies the department, in writing, that the test was compromised due to equipment malfunction, staff error, or another circumstance authorized by the department, and the department authorizes the retest of that sample. Existing law requires the testing laboratory to issue a certificate of analysis that the cannabis batch has passed the testing requirements, and authorizes the testing laboratory to amend the certificate of analysis to correct minor errors, as specified. This bill would specify that all cannabis or cannabis products are subject to test or retest, and would revise the retest requirements to instead authorize a testing laboratory to retest a sample of cannabis or cannabis products if either the testing laboratory notifies the department, in writing, that the test was compromised due to equipment malfunction or staff error, if the department requires the retest, or if the department authorizes the request. This bill would require the licensee to allow the department to obtain or access any cannabis or cannabis products held or offered for retail sale for the purposes of conducting off-the-shelf laboratory testing. The bill would also require a retailer and any other licensee authorized to engage in the retail sale of cannabis or cannabis products to provide the certificate of analysis associated with any cannabis or cannabis product held or offered for retail sale to a customer upon request. This bill would also require a testing laboratory to be subject to performance testing to ensure consistency of results across laboratories. Existing law authorizes a testing laboratory to receive and test samples of cannabis or cannabis products from state or local law enforcement, or a prosecuting or regulatory agency, as specified, and provides that the testing of that cannabis is not commercial cannabis activity for purposes of MAUCRSA and is not arranged or overseen by the department. This bill would require a licensed testing laboratory to comply with the department's request to evaluate the laboratory's testing practice.
Bill status
passed both
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Aug 2026
Assembly Passage
May 2026
Senate Passage
Aug 2026
Governor
Introduced Feb 13, 2026
Last action Aug 27, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
08/24/26 - Enrolled
→
AB1965
·
3 edits
MINOR
This diff reflects a formatting and presentation change only. The bill text was converted from the formal enrolled document layout (with legislative headers, signatures, page numbers, and chapter numbering) to a web page presentation format on the California Legislature website. The actual statutory content of Sections 26070, 26100, and 26104 is substantively identical in both versions.
TECHNICAL
Removed formal enrolled document formatting including legislative headers, passage dates, signature lines, page numbers, and chapter number
Added web page navigation elements such as menus, search boxes, sidebar links, and bill metadata display (vote type, appropriation status, fiscal committee designation)
Reformatted the statutory text with different line breaks and spacing to suit web display, but no substantive policy language was changed
Floor votes · Senate Aug 20, 2026 · Assembly May 21, 2026
How they voted
39–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 40
Aug 20, 2026
D
Democratic30
96% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
8
Committee
10
Aug 20, 2026
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Aug 20, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0.).
upper
Aug 13, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 13).
upper
Aug 3, 2026
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 29, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 3, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. P. & E.D.
upper
May 21, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 5210.)
lower
May 14, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 14).
lower
Apr 22, 2026
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 7, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 19. Noes 0.) (April 7). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 2, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & P.
lower
Feb 14, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
LaShae Sharp-Collins
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1965
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1965. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline