AB 1955 California Assembly · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Crimes: firearm enhancements.

Summary
Under existing law, anyone who personally uses a firearm in the commission of a specified felony offense shall be punished by an additional and consecutive term of imprisonment in the state prison for 10 years, or by 20 years if they discharge the firearm, or by imprisonment for 25 years to life if they discharge the firearm and proximately causes great bodily harm. Existing law prohibits the application of these firearm enhancements to the lawful use or discharge of a firearm by a peace officer, under specified circumstances, or by any person in lawful self-defense, lawful defense of another, or lawful defense of property. This bill would, notwithstanding the exemption above, prohibit the application of these firearm enhancements to a peace officer, as defined, unless the use or discharge of the firearm did not arise out of and was not in the course of employment. The bill would place the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence on the prosecution that the firearm enhancements apply to a peace officer. The bill would define "arise out of and in the course of employment" for these purposes. By placing the burden of proof on, and thus imposing a new duty on, local prosecutors, the bill would create a state-mandated local program. The bill would make a technical, nonsubstantive change. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status in committee 1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 13, 2026 Last action Mar 18, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons

What changed between versions

02/13/26 - Introduced 03/09/26 - Amended Assembly · 6 edits · Mar 9, 2026
MODERATE
The amended version of AB 1955 adds a major new provision amending Penal Code Section 12022.53 to create an exemption from firearm enhancements for peace officers acting in the course of their employment, with the burden of proof placed on the prosecution to show the exemption does not apply. The original bill only addressed threats against public officials (Section 71), but the amendment significantly expands scope by adding this officer protection provision. The Section 71 changes are largely technical (removing 'telephone' from the communication list, gender-neutral language fixes).
SCOPE

Entirely new Section 1 amending Penal Code 12022.53 to add subdivision (m), which exempts peace officers from firearm enhancements unless the use or discharge of a firearm did not arise out of and was not in the course of their employment.

Clarifies that the peace officer exemption does not affect the underlying charge or any other applicable enhancements or penalties unrelated to firearm use.

ENFORCEMENT

The prosecution bears the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the peace officer exemption does not apply. If the prosecution fails to meet this burden, the court shall not impose the enhancement and any reference to it must be stricken from the charging document or verdict.

DEFINITION

Defines 'arise out of and in the course of employment' as determined based on facts and circumstances at the time of the incident, including whether the officer was performing services arising out of or incidental to their employment or acting within the course of their employment.

TECHNICAL

Section 71 (threats against public officials) was renumbered from Section 1 to Section 2, and underwent minor technical edits: removed 'telephone' from the list of direct communication methods, changed 'his their duties' to 'their duties,' and made other gender-neutral language corrections.

FISCAL

Added a reimbursement provision (new Section 2) stating no state reimbursement is required under Article XIII B because the act changes penalties for crimes. Fiscal committee and state-mandated local program designations changed from 'no' to 'yes.'

Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
7
Key actions
3
Committee
5
Amendments
1
Mar 18, 2026
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 17, 2026
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 10, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 9, 2026
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 2, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 14, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Juan Alanis
Juan Alanis
RRepublican
CA
22