Land surveyors: records of survey.
Summary
Existing law establishes a record of survey review process, which requires a county surveyor to examine a record of survey for compliance with specified requirements, and authorizes the county surveyor to charge a reasonable fee for examining a record of survey, as provided, and not to exceed the cost of the service. Existing law requires that, if a record of survey complies with the specified requirements, the county surveyor must endorse a statement of examination on the record of survey and present it to the county recorder for filing. Existing law requires that, if the record of survey does not comply with the above requirements, the county surveyor must return it to the person who presented it with a written statement of the changes necessary to make it conform. This bill would, instead, require the county surveyor to return the record of survey to the licensed land surveyor or licensed civil engineer who presented it with a written statement of the changes necessary to make it conform. Existing law requires every person authorized to practice land surveying, if a corner or an accessory thereto, as specified, is found, set, reset, or used as control in any survey, to stamp with their seal and file with the county surveyor or engineer of the county where the corner is situated a written record of the establishment or restoration of the corner or accessory, except as specified. This bill would delete the option of filing the survey with the county engineer, and would make conforming changes. Existing law requires a corner record, as defined, to be examined for compliance with specified provisions, including that a corner record be signed and sealed by a land surveyor or civil engineer, as specified. Existing law requires that a monument set by a licensed land surveyor or registered civil engineer be permanently and visibly marked or tagged with the licensee's certificate number, as specified. This bill would revise the above corner record examination provisions to delete the authority for the county engineer to examine the corner record, and would require a county surveyor, when examining a corner record for compliance, to include compliance with specified monument identification and tagging requirements, as specified. By requiring a higher level of service from a county surveyor, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed both
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Jun 2026
Assembly Passage
May 2026
Senate Passage
Aug 2026
Governor
Introduced Feb 13, 2026
Last action Aug 20, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 4 comparisons
What changed between versions
08/11/26 - Amended Senate
→
AB1933
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes were made between these two versions. The diff reflects a conversion from the traditional printed legislative document format (with page numbers, line numbers, and layout markers) to a web-based rendering of the same bill text. All four sections of the bill (amending Sections 8767, 8773, 8773.2, and the reimbursement provision) contain identical legal language in both versions.
TECHNICAL
The document was reformatted from a printed legislative layout (with line numbers, page breaks, and column formatting) to a web-based presentation with navigation elements. No changes to the actual statutory text were made.
Floor votes · Senate Aug 20, 2026 · Assembly May 26, 2026
How they voted
38–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 40
Aug 20, 2026
D
Democratic30
93% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
19
Key actions
8
Committee
6
Amendments
6
Aug 20, 2026
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 20, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 38. Noes 0.).
upper
Aug 11, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
upper
Jun 29, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 18, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 17, 2026
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (June 15).
upper
Jun 3, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. P. & E.D.
upper
May 26, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 77. Noes 0.)
lower
Apr 22, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (April 22).
lower
Apr 9, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 8, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Apr 7, 2026
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 19. Noes 0.) (April 7).
lower
Mar 2, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on B. & P.
lower
Feb 14, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 16.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Joshua Hoover
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1933
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1933. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline