AB 1922 California Assembly · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Restraint of incarcerated persons.

Summary
Existing law establishes the Board of State and Community Corrections and declares that the mission of the board is to provide statewide leadership, coordination, and technical assistance to promote effective state and local efforts and partnerships in California's adult and juvenile criminal justice system consistent with the statewide goal of improved public safety through cost-effective, promising, and evidence-based strategies for managing criminal justice populations. Existing law requires the board to establish minimum standards for local correctional facilities, including the safety of incarcerated individuals, and to biennially review and make appropriate revisions to those standards. This bill would require the board's standards to prohibit an incarcerated patient who is admitted to a hospital from being restrained by the use of mechanical restraints, as defined, while receiving an advanced level of medical services, as defined, except as specified. If there is an imminent physical threat while the incarcerated patient is in the hospital, the bill would require the standards to provide that a hospital may initiate their medical restraint process, as specified, and would prohibit the use of mechanical restraints by local correctional facility staff if there is an imminent physical threat while the incarcerated patient is in the hospital. The bill would authorize the use of mechanical restraints by state correctional facility staff or juvenile facility staff if an incarcerated adult or juvenile patient attempts to escape from the hospital, subject to certain requirements. Existing law prohibits the application of restraints to incarcerated pregnant persons, as specified. Existing law requires a pregnant person who is incarcerated in a prison to be temporarily taken to a hospital outside the prison for the purpose of giving childbirth and to be transported in the least restrictive way possible and in accordance with the above-described provisions. Existing law also specifies the circumstances during which a juvenile may be placed in mechanical restraints, including during transportation between facilities. This bill would prohibit juveniles and incarcerated persons admitted to a hospital from being restrained by the use of mechanical restraints while receiving an advanced level of medical services, as defined. If there is an imminent physical threat while the incarcerated patient is in the hospital, the bill would authorize a hospital to initiate its medical restraint process, as specified, and would prohibit the use of mechanical restraints by state correctional facility staff or juvenile facility staff. The bill would authorize the use of mechanical restraints by state correctional facility staff or juvenile facility staff if an incarcerated adult or juvenile patient attempts to escape from the hospital, subject to certain requirements. By placing new requirements on local correctional facility and juvenile facility staff, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status in committee 1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 12, 2026 Last action Apr 7, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons

What changed between versions

03/26/26 - Amended Assembly AB1922 · 5 edits
MODERATE
AB 1922 was amended to significantly narrow the scope of its prohibition on mechanical restraints for hospitalized incarcerated persons. The bill now only prohibits shackling during 'an advanced level of medical services' (a defined list of specific interventions like surgery, chemotherapy, and mechanical ventilation) rather than during all time spent as an admitted patient. The definition of 'imminent physical threat' was also narrowed from any imminent risk of harm to specifically violent or self-destructive behavior.
SCOPE

The core prohibition on mechanical restraints was narrowed from applying 'while receiving care' (all time as an admitted hospital patient) to only 'while receiving an advanced level of medical services,' which is defined as specific interventions including mechanical ventilation, medical sedation, surgery, vasopressors, medical paralysis, chemotherapy, dialysis, comfort measures, and peripartum or postpartum management. Emergency department services are explicitly excluded.

The same narrowing from 'while receiving care' to 'an advanced level of medical services' was applied to the juvenile provisions in Welfare and Institutions Code Section 210.6, meaning shackled juveniles in hospitals are now only protected during specific advanced interventions rather than their entire admission.

DEFINITION

The definition of 'imminent physical threat' was narrowed from 'an imminent risk of harm to the incarcerated person, medical staff, or other individuals' to specifically 'violent or self-destructive behavior that jeopardizes the immediate physical safety of the patient, a staff member, or others.' This limits when hospitals can use their medical restraint process.

The definition of 'while receiving care' (which covered all medical services including examinations, diagnostic procedures, treatments, surgical procedures, postoperative recovery, hospice care, and all other time spent within a hospital as an admitted patient) was removed from both the state prison and local facility provisions.

REQUIREMENT

A savings clause ('Except as otherwise provided in this section') was added to the main prohibition in both Penal Code Section 2652.6 and Welfare and Institutions Code Section 210.6, creating an explicit exception mechanism for the restraint ban.

Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
8
Key actions
4
Committee
6
Amendments
1
Apr 7, 2026
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, final hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 6, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 26, 2026
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 18, 2026
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 17, 2026
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 2, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 13, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 15.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Josh Lowenthal
Josh Lowenthal
DDemocratic
CA
69