AB 1865 California Assembly · 2025-2026 Regular Session

Text message advertisements.

Summary
Existing law generally prohibits a person, entity conducting business, candidate, or political committee in this state from transmitting, or causing to be transmitted, a text message advertisement to specified devices. Existing law excepts from this prohibition specific text message advertisements, including a text message advertisement transmitted by a business, candidate, or political committee that has an existing relationship with the subscriber if the subscriber is offered an option not to receive text messages from that business, candidate, or political committee. Existing law defines terms for these purposes, including "text message advertisement." Existing law enforces these prohibitions pursuant to the provisions related to unfair competition and makes a violation of these provisions a misdemeanor. This bill would prohibit an allowed text message advertisement from being transmitted to a recipient between 9:00 p.m. and 9:00 a.m., regardless of whether the recipient consented to receiving a text message advertisement. The bill would require a sender to adjust message timing to Pacific standard time. The bill would authorize the recipient of a text message advertisement in violation of this timing prohibition to bring a civil action against a transmitter who knew, or should have known, the text message advertisement violated this prohibition. The bill would also authorize a public prosecutor or the Attorney General to bring an action to enforce these provisions for specified remedies. The bill would, notwithstanding any other law, exclude a violation of this prohibition from being a crime.
Bill status in committee 1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 11, 2026 Last action May 14, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons

What changed between versions

02/11/26 - Introduced 03/17/26 - Amended Assembly · 3 edits · Mar 17, 2026
MINOR
The amended version makes two substantive policy changes: it replaces the requirement that senders adjust message timing to the recipient's local time zone with a uniform Pacific Standard Time standard, and it adds an anti-circumvention provision requiring any text message that contains an advertisement in whole or in part to comply with the section. The remaining changes are technical cleanups including removing a redundant definition from the operative text and fixing grammatical errors.
Scope change
The bill's scope is effectively narrowed in practice: by fixing the quiet hours window to Pacific Standard Time rather than the recipient's local time zone, senders face a single uniform standard. This makes compliance simpler but provides less protection for recipients who live in different time zones (e.g., someone with a California number living in the Eastern time zone would have their quiet hours shifted).
REQUIREMENT

The timing requirement in subdivision (f)(2) was changed from requiring senders to adjust message timing based on the recipient's local time zone associated with their telephone number, to using Pacific Standard Time for all recipients. This simplifies compliance for senders but means the quiet hours window (9 p.m. to 9 a.m.) is now fixed to California time regardless of where the recipient actually is.

SCOPE

A new subdivision (a)(3) was added stating that a text message containing, in whole or in part, a text message advertisement shall comply with this section. This closes a potential loophole where a sender could embed advertising content within a larger non-advertising message to avoid the restrictions.

TECHNICAL

The definition of 'text message advertisement' was removed from subdivision (a)(1) and retained only in the definitions section (h)(2), eliminating redundancy. Several grammatical errors were also corrected throughout (e.g., 'no a person' to 'a person', 'he or she has they have' to 'they have').

Floor votes

How they voted

No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
9
Key actions
4
Committee
7
Amendments
1
May 14, 2026
Lower · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
lower
May 6, 2026
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 22, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 1.) (April 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 25, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (March 25). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 18, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on P. & C.P.
lower
Mar 17, 2026
Introduced
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on P. & C.P. Read second time and amended.
lower
Feb 23, 2026
Committee
Referred to Coms. on P. & C.P. and JUD.
lower
Feb 12, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 14.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Rebecca Bauer-Kahan
Rebecca Bauer-Kahan
DDemocratic
CA
16