Air pollution: indirect sources.
Summary
Existing law generally designates the State Air Resources Board as the state agency with the primary responsibility for the control of vehicular air pollution, and air pollution control districts and air quality management districts with the primary responsibility for the control of air pollution from all sources other than vehicular sources. Existing law authorizes air districts to adopt and implement regulations to reduce or mitigate emissions from indirect sources of air pollution. Existing law requires the state board to adopt rules and regulations relating to vehicular emissions standards, as specified, that will achieve the ambient air quality standards required by federal law in conjunction with other measures adopted by the state board, air districts, and the United States Environmental Protection Agency. This bill would authorize the state board, if necessary to carry out that duty to achieve those ambient air quality standards, to adopt regulations to reduce or mitigate emissions from indirect sources of pollution. Existing law makes any violation of a rule or regulation of the state board relating to nonvehicular air pollution control a misdemeanor. Because a violation of these regulations of the state board with respect to nonvehicular sources subject to those regulations would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 9, 2026
Last action May 18, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
02/09/26 - Introduced
→
AB1777
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes occurred between these two versions. The diff reflects only a change in document formatting: the 'from' version uses the traditional legislative document layout with line numbers, while the 'to' version is a web-page rendering of the same introduced bill text from the California legislature website, including navigation elements and a different visual structure.
TECHNICAL
The bill text was reformatted from the official legislative document style (with line numbers and traditional layout) to a web page presentation that includes site navigation elements (home, accessibility, FAQ, etc.) and a different typographic structure. The actual statutory language of Section 39602.5(a)-(d) and Section 2 is identical in both versions.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
7
Key actions
3
Committee
5
May 14, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 4.) (May 14).
lower
Apr 8, 2026
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Mar 24, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 4.) (March 23). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Feb 23, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Feb 10, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 12.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Robert Garcia
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1777
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1777. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline