Civil actions: service of summons: commercial buildings.
Summary
Existing law prescribes specified methods for the service of a summons in a civil action. Existing law provides that if a copy of the summons and complaint cannot with reasonable diligence be personally delivered to the person to be served, the summons may be served by leaving a copy at the person's dwelling house, usual place of abode, usual place of business, or usual mailing address, in the presence of a person who is at least 18 years of age, and by thereafter mailing a copy of the summons and complaint, as specified. This method of service is known as substituted service. This bill would authorize substituted service of process on a tenant or occupant of a commercial building, as defined, wherein access to the tenant spaces is controlled by security personnel, concierge staff, or similar agents, if the person attempting service is refused entry or is otherwise prevented from making a direct attempt at personal service. Under this bill, service of process would be deemed effective by leaving a copy of the documents to be served with security personnel, concierge staff, or similar agents of the commercial building. The bill would deem service in such a manner to constitute substituted service on the tenant or occupant of the commercial building. The bill would deem service completed on the date and at the time of service, if specified conditions are met. Under this bill, a proof of service would require a declaration setting forth specified information, such as the date, time, and place of service, and the identity or description of the person controlling access with whom the documents were deposited, and facts showing that the person appeared to be at least 18 years of age and in charge of the central access point of the commercial building. These provisions would not apply when an alternative authorized method of service is chosen by the serving party and would not apply to individuals, as defined.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 5, 2026
Last action Mar 19, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 1 comparison
What changed between versions
02/05/26 - Introduced
→
AB1742
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes were made between these two versions of AB 1742. The differences are entirely presentational: the bill text was reformatted from a printed legislative document layout (with line numbers, page headers, and footers) into a web page format that includes navigation menus, search tools, and links to related bill information pages.
TECHNICAL
The bill text was re-presented in a web page format with added navigation elements (home, accessibility, FAQ, feedback, sitemap, login, quick search, bill tracking links) replacing the original printed document layout with line numbers and page headers.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
5
Key actions
3
Committee
4
Mar 19, 2026
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 4, 2026
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Feb 23, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 6, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 8.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Phillip Chen
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1742
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1742. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline