Local Agency Public Construction Act: change orders: County of Los Angeles: County of Santa Clara.
Summary
Existing law, the Local Agency Public Construction Act, regulates contracting by local agencies, including counties and special districts. The act includes specific provisions for contracting by counties and contracting for county highways, bridges, and subways, and county waterworks districts. Those provisions include change order authorization for contracts, as prescribed, and impose caps on the extra cost of any change order, varying with the value of the original contract. Existing law, until January 1, 2027, authorizes the County of Los Angeles and the County of Santa Clara to add a change order cap of $400,000 for contracts whose original cost exceeds $25,000,000 and of $750,000 for contracts whose original cost exceeds $50,000,000, both of which are adjusted annually to reflect the percentage change in the California Consumer Price Index. Existing law imposes similar caps for both counties with regard to county highways and similar caps for the County of Los Angeles with regard to county bridges, subways, waterworks districts, and the Los Angeles County Flood Control District. That law requires the provisions specific to the County of Los Angeles and the County of Santa Clara modify no more than 7 contracts and requires those counties to provide a review report to the Assembly Committee on Local Government and the Senate Committee on Governance and Finance no later than July 1, 2026. This bill would no longer require the County of Los Angeles and the County of Santa Clara to modify no more than 7 contracts and no longer require those counties to provide a review report, as described above. The bill would delete the January 1, 2027, repeal date, thereby extending these provisions indefinitely. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the County of Santa Clara and the County of Los Angeles.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Jun 2026
Assembly Passage
May 2026
Senate Passage
Jun 2026
Signed into Law
Jun 2026
Introduced Jan 29, 2026
Signed Jun 30, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons
What changed between versions
01/29/26 - Introduced
→
06/22/26 - Enrolled
·
3 edits
·
Jun 22, 2026
MINOR
AB 1658 was amended between introduction and enrollment to remove three key limitations on Los Angeles County and Santa Clara County's elevated change order authority: the cap of no more than 7 contracts that could be modified under the higher thresholds, the requirement to submit a review report to legislative committees by July 1, 2026, and the January 1, 2027 sunset date. The net effect is that both counties can now use their higher change order caps ($400,000 for contracts over $25 million and $750,000 for contracts over $50 million) without a contract count limit, without reporting obligations, and on a permanent basis rather than expiring in 2027.
Scope change
The geographic scope remains unchanged (Los Angeles County and Santa Clara County), but the practical scope of authority expanded significantly by removing the 7-contract limit and making the provisions permanent instead of sunsetting on January 1, 2027.
REQUIREMENT
Removed the limitation that the elevated change order provisions would not apply if more than 7 contracts were modified across all applicable sections. Both Los Angeles County and Santa Clara County can now modify an unlimited number of contracts under the higher caps.
ENFORCEMENT
Removed the requirement for both counties to provide a review report to the Assembly Committee on Local Government and the Senate Committee on Governance and Finance no later than July 1, 2026, eliminating the legislative oversight mechanism.
TIMELINE
Deleted the January 1, 2027 sunset/repeal date from all affected sections (20142, 20395, 20405, 20614, and 20998), making the elevated change order caps for Los Angeles County and Santa Clara County permanent rather than temporary.
Floor votes · Senate Jun 18, 2026 · Assembly May 11, 2026
How they voted
37–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 40
Jun 18, 2026
D
Democratic30
96% Yea
R
Republican10
80% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Jun 30, 2026
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jun 18, 2026
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Jun 18, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 4859.).
upper
Jun 10, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 10).
upper
May 20, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
upper
May 11, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 70. Noes 2. Page 4993.)
lower
Apr 30, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 29).
lower
Feb 17, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Jan 30, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 1.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ash Kalra
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1658
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1658. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline