Trespass.
Summary
Existing law makes it a misdemeanor to commit the crime of trespass, which includes refusing or failing to leave land, real property, or structures belonging to, or lawfully occupied by, another and not open to the general public upon being requested to leave by a peace officer at the request of the owner, the owner's agent, or the person in lawful possession and upon being informed by the peace officer that they are acting at the request of the owner, the owner's agent, or the person in lawful possession. Existing law requires the owner, the owner's agent, or the person in lawful possession to make a separate request to the peace officer on each occasion when the peace officer's assistance in dealing with a trespass is requested, except that a single request for peace officer assistance may be made for a period not to exceed 12 months when there is a fire hazard to the premises or property, the owner is absent from the premises or property, or the premises or property is closed to the public and posted as being closed. Existing law authorizes a single request for assistance to be made and submitted electronically, in a notarized form provided by the law enforcement agency, to a peace officer, and authorizes local governments to accept electronic submissions of requests for peace officer assistance. This bill would remove the requirement that the submitted form described above be notarized, and would instead require the request to include a written declaration, signed under penalty of perjury, that the requestor is the owner of the property and has legal authority to request the assistance, that the information provided in the request is true and correct, that the requestor acknowledges that law enforcement may rely on the declaration in taking enforcement action, and that the requestor is required to notify law enforcement if they no longer have legal authority over the property or if the request is withdrawn. The bill would authorize law enforcement to reasonably rely on the above-described declaration unless it has actual knowledge that the declaration is false. By expanding the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed both
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Jun 2026
Assembly Passage
May 2026
Senate Passage
Aug 2026
Governor
Introduced Jan 26, 2026
Last action Aug 24, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons
What changed between versions
06/10/26 - Amended Senate
→
AB1632
·
1 edit
MINOR
The diff between these two versions of AB 1632 reflects only a change in document presentation format, from a traditional printed legislative document (with line numbers, page headers, and footers) to a web-based publication layout. The substantive statutory text of Section 602 of the Penal Code and all policy provisions remain identical between the two versions.
TECHNICAL
The bill was reformatted from a traditional legislative document with line numbers, page breaks, and headers into a web-based publication format with navigation elements (skip to content, home, accessibility, FAQ, etc.). No substantive policy language was added, removed, or altered.
Floor votes · Senate Aug 24, 2026 · Assembly May 7, 2026
How they voted
37–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 40
Aug 24, 2026
D
Democratic30
90% Yea
R
Republican10
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
8
Committee
7
Amendments
5
Aug 24, 2026
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 24, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0.).
upper
Jun 22, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 11, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.
upper
Jun 10, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.
upper
Jun 9, 2026
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 9).
upper
May 20, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 7, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 63. Noes 0. Page 4957.)
lower
Mar 19, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
Mar 18, 2026
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (March 17).
lower
Mar 6, 2026
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Feb 24, 2026
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Feb 9, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jan 27, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 26.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Natasha Johnson
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1632
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1632. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline