Public employees' retirement: administration.
Summary
(1) Existing law, the Teachers' Retirement Law, establishes the State Teachers' Retirement System (STRS) and creates the Defined Benefit Program of the State Teachers' Retirement Plan, which provides a defined benefit to members of the program, based on final compensation, credited service, and age at retirement, subject to certain variations. STRS is administered by the Teachers' Retirement Board. Existing law also creates the Cash Balance Benefit Program, which is administered by the board, to provide a retirement plan for the benefit of participating employees who provide creditable service for less than 50% of full time. Existing law requires certain board members to receive $100 for attendance at board and committee meetings. This bill would increase that rate to $320. (2) Existing law, the Public Employees' Retirement Law (PERL) , creates the Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) for the purpose of providing pension benefits to state employees and employees of contracting agencies and prescribes the rights and duties of members of the system and their beneficiaries. Existing law vests management and control of PERS in its board of administration. Existing law authorizes certain board members to receive $100 for attendance at a meeting of the board or committee thereof, as prescribed. This bill would increase that rate to $320. (3) Existing law, the County Employees Retirement Law of 1937, authorizes counties to establish retirement systems pursuant to its provisions in order to provide pension benefits to county, city, and district employees and their beneficiaries. Existing law sets forth the membership composition for boards of retirement and boards of investment, as specified. Existing law authorizes the board of supervisors for counties for which these provisions apply to provide that certain members of these boards shall receive compensation at a rate of not more than $100 for a meeting or for a meeting of a committee authorized by the entire board. This bill would authorize the above-described compensation rate to be increased by the board of retirement to not more than $320 per meeting, and would provide that this provision would not be operative in any county until it is publicly noticed and adopted by a majority vote of the board of supervisors, as specified. Existing law, applicable to Los Angeles County, authorizes the board of supervisors to provide compensation to certain members of the board of retirement and board of investments at a rate of not more than $100 for a board or committee meeting, subject to certain limits. This bill would authorize the above-described compensation rate to be increased by the board of retirement or board of investments to a rate of not more than $320 per meeting. The bill would prohibit this provision from becoming operative until it is publicly noticed and adopted by a majority vote of the board of supervisors, as specified.
Bill status
passed both
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Aug 2026
Assembly Passage
May 2026
Senate Passage
Aug 2026
Governor
Introduced Jan 21, 2026
Last action Aug 25, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 3 comparisons
What changed between versions
08/21/26 - Enrolled
→
AB1619
·
2 edits
MINOR
No substantive policy changes occurred between these two versions. The diff reflects a transition from the formal enrolled bill format (with page numbers, chapter heading, and governor's signature block) to a web-based rendering of the same bill text. All four sections amending Education Code 22223 and Government Code 20091, 31521, and 31521.1 are identical in both versions.
TECHNICAL
The document was reformatted from a formal enrolled bill layout (with page numbers, chapter heading, and signature block) to a web page display with navigation elements. No legislative language was changed.
A 'Digest Key' metadata section was added showing Vote: MAJORITY, Appropriation: NO, Fiscal Committee: YES, Local Program: NO.
Floor votes · Senate Aug 19, 2026 · Assembly May 27, 2026
How they voted
37–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 40
Aug 19, 2026
D
Democratic30
93% Yea
R
Republican10
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
19
Key actions
9
Committee
8
Amendments
2
Aug 19, 2026
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Aug 19, 2026
Upper · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 37. Noes 0.).
upper
Jun 29, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 17, 2026
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 17). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 3, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on L., P.E. & R.
upper
May 27, 2026
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (73-2-4)
assembly
May 26, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 74. Noes 2.)
lower
May 13, 2026
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (May 13).
lower
Apr 27, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.
lower
Apr 23, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
lower
Apr 22, 2026
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 22).
lower
Feb 2, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on P. E. & R.
lower
Jan 22, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 21.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1619
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1619. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline