Hate crimes: political affiliation.
Summary
Existing law defines "hate crime" as a criminal act committed, in whole or in part, because of actual or perceived characteristics of the victim, including, among other things, race, religion, disability, and sexual orientation. Except as provided, existing law requires the fact that a person committed or attempted to commit a felony that is a hate crime to be considered a circumstance in aggravation of the crime in imposing a specified term. This bill, the Hortman-Kirk Political Violence Prevention Act, in the case of any felony conviction, would authorize the court to consider as a circumstance in aggravation in sentencing the fact that the defendant's conduct was motivated, in whole or in part, by the victim's actual or perceived political affiliation. The bill would define "political affiliation" to mean the state of belonging to a political party, the endorsement of a political party or a platform of a political party, or the endorsement of a politician or a platform of a politician. By increasing the punishment for a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2026
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Jan 5, 2026
Last action May 14, 2026
Maddy AI version diff · 2 comparisons
What changed between versions
03/05/26 - Amended Assembly
→
AB1535
·
1 edit
MINOR
No substantive policy changes occurred between these two versions of AB 1535. The differences are entirely presentational: the 'from' version is a formatted legislative document with line numbers and page headers, while the 'to' version is a web-rendered copy of the same bill text with website navigation elements. All legal provisions - the addition of political affiliation to the hate crime definition, the sentencing aggravation provision, and the no-reimbursement clause - are identical in both versions.
TECHNICAL
Formatting and presentation changes only: removal of line numbers, page headers/footers, and insertion of website navigation elements (search boxes, links, share buttons). No legal text was altered.
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
8
Key actions
3
Committee
5
Amendments
2
May 14, 2026
Lower · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
lower
Apr 8, 2026
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Mar 9, 2026
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 5, 2026
Lower · Passed
Read second time and amended.
lower
Mar 4, 2026
Introduced
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (March 3).
lower
Feb 2, 2026
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Jan 6, 2026
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 5.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Laurie Davies
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1535
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1535. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline